Plot a graph to verify the inverse square law and use the graph to estimate ?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around verifying the inverse square law using experimental data from gamma ray count rates at varying distances from a cobalt-60 source. The user has successfully plotted the graph but is confused about how to calculate the "extra distance" between the source and the detector. Clarification is sought regarding the term "extra distance," as the user already has measured distances. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between count rates and distance in the context of the inverse square law. Overall, the user is looking for guidance on interpreting their graph to find additional distance information.
nomanslan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I know that this is my first post, but please help me! I am having trouble with the following question

"The following data was collected from an experiment to measure the gamma ray count-rate at different distances from a sample of cobalt-60 The background count was measured five times. Background count (per minute) = 12, 14, 10, 15, 12.

Count (per minute) 413 161 92 60 43 35 26
Distance between source and detector (cm) 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.0 8.0

Plot a suitable graph to verify the inverse square law and use the graph to estimate the extra distance, d, between the source and the detector."

i have plotted the graph, but i am unsure on have to calculate the extra distance using it.

Thank you so much for all your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF nomanslan!

I'm unclear on what you mean by "the extra distance" between source and detector. You measured the distance between source and detector, did you not?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K