Question about Inverse Square law and sound intensity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster is tasked with exploring the relationship between sound intensity and distance to the sound source, specifically investigating the inverse square law. They seek to demonstrate this relationship through plotting and analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss methods for plotting the inverse square law, including suggestions for transforming data to achieve a linear representation. There are questions regarding the specific form of the data, which deviates from the expected theoretical model.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering various plotting strategies and discussing the implications of experimental data fitting the theoretical model. There is recognition of the challenges posed by discrepancies in the data.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of experimental error and the inherent limitations of proving physical theories, as well as the specific form of the data that does not align perfectly with the inverse square law.

Hannes
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For school, I have to make a task about sound intensity and the distance to the sound source. I have to prove that the relation between these two is known as the inverse square law _1/ I_2 = ( _2/_1 )².
Does someone know how I can plot the inverse square law or prove that it counts for this graph?
Thanks
upload_2016-10-21_21-30-38.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hannes said:
Does someone know how I can plot the inverse square law
A good approach is plot a function of the data which ought to yield a straight line. So if you expect y=1/x2 then plot x2 on one axis and 1/y on the other; or 1/x2 on one and y on the other, etc.
Does that help?
 
Yes that should normally be the plot of the inverse square law but in this case I have 0.0000002/x^1,975 and not 1/x^1.975 and I don't know how to solve that.
 
Hannes said:
Yes that should normally be the plot of the inverse square law but in this case I have 0.0000002/x^1,975 and not 1/x^1.975 and I don't know how to solve that.
Experimental data will never perfectly fit the theoretical curve. Indeed, it is not possible to prove physical theories, it is only possible to disprove them or to fail to disprove them (which is called confirming them).
So here you just need to show that the data are consistent an inverse square law, within the bounds of experimental error.

Another way to plot the data as a straight line is on a log-log graph.
 
But this fits far from perfectly and we can't find our mistake.
 
Hannes said:
But this fits far from perfectly and we can't find our mistake.
Oh, I thought you were worried about the 1.975, instead of 2.
The constant multiplier can be anything. 0.0000002 is as good as any.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K