Point-like particles, form factors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electron is confirmed as a point-like particle through observations of its form factor, which aligns with the characteristics expected of such particles. The discussion references the work of Povh, Rith, Scholz, and Zetsche in "Particle and Nuclei," specifically section 5.2 on Rutherford cross-section. The analysis involves scattering electrons off heavy targets using the Born approximation, leading to the definition of the electric form factor as the Fourier transform of the charge distribution. Experimental evidence, such as findings from HERA in Germany, supports that the electron maintains its point-like nature down to a scale one-thousandth the size of a proton.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and particle physics
  • Familiarity with the Born approximation in scattering theory
  • Knowledge of Fourier transforms and their application in physics
  • Basic concepts of form factors in particle interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Born approximation in detail to understand its implications in scattering processes
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of form factors in quantum field theory
  • Explore experimental techniques used in high-energy physics, particularly those used at HERA
  • Investigate the implications of point-like particles in quantum electrodynamics (QED)
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in particle physics, and students studying quantum mechanics who seek to understand the nature of fundamental particles and their interactions.

hmm.max
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering how it has been determined that the electron is really a point-like particle. Searching for this topic, I came across a post by humanino, saying that one way we know this is that observations of the electron's "form factor" are consistent with what you'd see for a pointlike particle.

I've never heard of form factors before. I googled the term and couldn't find any basic explanation of it. Could anyone help me to understand-
1. what a form factor is
2. In general, how we know that the electron is pointlike

In particular, suppose I wanted to believe that instead of being a fundamentally pointlike thing whose position was often indefinite, the particle was always a continuously distributed entity that sometimes became localized into very narrow regions. what would be wrong with such an idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I described it in detailed once. I will follow Povh, Rith, Scholz, Zetsche "Particle and nuclei" 5.2 "Rutherford cross-section"

Suppose we scatter an electron off a heavy target. In the Born approximation, the ingoing and outgoing electron waves are plane
\Psi_i = \frac{1}{\sqrt{V}}e^{i\vec{p}\vec{x}/\hbar} and \Psi_f = \frac{1}{\sqrt{V}}e^{i\vec{p'}\vec{x}/\hbar}
The cross-section will be given in the lowest order (one photon approximation) by a phase-space factor times the amplitude given by the interaction Hamiltonian
<\Psi_f|\mathcal{H_\text{int}}|\Psi_i>=\frac{e}{V}\int\text{d}^3x\, e^{-i\vec{p'}\vec{x}/\hbar}V(\vec{x})e^{i\vec{p}\vec{x}/\hbar}
Next you need to massage this a little bit to
<\Psi_f|\mathcal{H_\text{int}}|\Psi_i>=\frac{-e\hbar^2}{V|\vec{q}^2|}\int\text{d}^3x\, \Delta V(\vec{x})e^{i\vec{q}\vec{x}/\hbar}

where \vec{q}=\vec{p}-\vec{p'} is the momentum transfer

Now use Poisson equation for the laplacian of the potential
\Delta V{\vec{x})=\frac{-\rho(\vec{x})}{\epsilon_0}
et voila !
<\Psi_f|\mathcal{H_\text{int}}|\Psi_i>=\frac{-e\hbar^2}{\epsilon_0V\vec{q}^2} \int\text{d}^3x\, \rho(\vec{x})e^{i\vec{q}\vec{x}/\hbar}
The definition of the electric form factor, the Fourier transform of the charge distribution :
F(\vec{q})=\int\text{d}^3x\, \rho(\vec{x})e^{i\vec{q}\vec{x}/\hbar}

In practice it can become more complicated, especially angular distributions are modified due to spin structures. For instance, HERA in Germany confirmed the electron remains point-like down to a thousandth the size of a proton.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K