Point of equilibrium with 2 charged spheres

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the points of equilibrium for two concentric coplanar rings with charge densities of -Qe and √27Qe. The electric fields produced by each ring are calculated using the equations E1 = -KQZ/(Z² + a²)^(3/2) and E2 = KQ(27)^(1/2)Z/(Z² + 4a²)^(3/2). The equilibrium points occur where the sum of the electric fields E1 and E2 equals zero along the Z-axis. The solution involves solving a sixth-degree polynomial derived from the condition for equilibrium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and their vector nature
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's Law and Gauss' Law
  • Ability to solve polynomial equations
  • Knowledge of charge distributions and their effects on electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Coulomb's Law in calculating electric fields from point charges
  • Learn about the superposition principle in electrostatics
  • Explore methods for solving higher-degree polynomial equations
  • Investigate the implications of electric field symmetry in charge distributions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as anyone involved in solving problems related to electric fields and charge distributions.

likephysics
Messages
638
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Two arbitrarily thin concentric coplanar rings of radius a and 2a carry uniformly distributed charge density -Qe and \sqrt{27}Qe, respectively.
Assuming that Z axis coincides with the rings' axes, and that the plane of the rings correspond to z=0, determine the location of all points of equilibrium(ie zero E field).


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Need some hint.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
likephysics said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Need some hint.

Use the superposition principle.
 
superposition came to my mind too. But didn't get any further. I consider the first sphere with charge -Qe. How find where E=0.
 
Sphere? What sphere?:confused:

Your problem statement tells you you have two infinitesimally thin rings of charge, not spheres.

Anyways, the superposition principle allows you to calculate the total electric field by adding the electric fields of each ring together. So, a good place to start might be to actually calculate the electric field of each ring.
 
Well, I used gauss' law and calculated the E field produced by each ring.

E1 = -KQZ/ (Z2+a2)3/2
and
E2 = KQ(27)1/2Z/ (Z2+4a2)3/2

I tried to find point where E1+E2=0 along Z. I just got lost in math. Am I going in the right direction?
 
likephysics said:
Well, [I used gauss' law[/color] and calculated the E field produced by each ring.

E1 = -KQZ/ (Z2+a2)3/2
and
E2 = KQ(27)1/2Z/ (Z2+4a2)3/2

I tried to find point where E1+E2=0 along Z. I just got lost in math. Am I going in the right direction?

Do you mean Coulomb's Law? There are none of the requisite symmetries present in this problem for Gauss' Law to be directly applicable.

Anyways, the fields you've given only give the z-components of each field (Remember, electric fields are vectors... they have 3 components and all 3 must be zero for equilibrium points) and only in the very special case that the field point is on the axis of the rings...what about points that are off-axis?

As for finding on-axis points where E=0; to make the math easier you might want to notice that \sqrt{27}=3^{3/2}. So, if you end up with an equation like \sqrt{27}(z^2+a^2)^{3/2}-(z^2+4a^2)^{3/2}=0 (which you should), You could rewrite it as (3z^2+3a^2)^{3/2}=(z^2+4a^2)^{3/2}. Squaring both sides of the equation will give you a 6th degree polynomial to find the roots of and hence there will be 6 roots (although they may not all be real valued). You should immediately notice however that two of those roots will satisfy the equation (3z^2+3a^2)=(z^2+4a^2) which you should have no difficulty solving.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K