Points on a Circle: Proving $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kaliprasad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Points
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if the points $(m_r, \frac{1}{m_r})$ for \( r = 1, 2, 3, 4 \) lie on a circle, then the product \( m_1m_2m_3m_4 = 1 \). This conclusion is derived from the geometric properties of circles and the relationships between the coordinates of the points. The proof leverages the symmetry of the circle and the properties of the coordinates, confirming the established relationship definitively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of coordinate geometry
  • Familiarity with the properties of circles
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their geometric interpretations
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the geometric properties of circles in coordinate geometry
  • Explore the relationship between points on a circle and their coordinates
  • Learn about the use of complex numbers in geometric proofs
  • Investigate other geometric proofs involving products of coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, geometry enthusiasts, and students studying coordinate geometry who are interested in geometric proofs and relationships between points on a circle.

kaliprasad
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
0
If $(m_r,\frac{1}{m_r})$ for r from 1 to 4 are 4 points that lie on a circle show that $m_1m_2m_3m_4= 1$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Perhaps something like this:

Let the circle be $$(x - a)^2 + (y - b)^2 = r^2$$.

The points $$\left( x_r , \frac{1}{x_r} \right)$$ are the points where (suitably selected) circle meets the function $$y = \frac{1}{x}$$. Substituting this into the equation of the circle gives a quartic equation:

$$x^4 - 2ax^3 + (a^2 + b^2 - r^2)x^2 - 2bx + 1 =0.$$

If one then further assume that the circle was suitably selected, there exists four real roots for that equation, namely $$x_1, x_2, x_3$$ and $$x_4$$, which are the numbers we are interested in. As they are roots of the quartic equation, one can write equivalently

$$(x - x_1)(x - x_2)(x - x_3)(x - x_4) = x_1x_2x_3x_4 + \ldots = 0$$.

Comparing these two ways to write the equation in question, one can conclude that $$x_1x_2x_3x_4 = 1$$.
 
kaliprasad said:
If $(m_r,\frac{1}{m_r})$ for r from 1 to 4 are 4 points that lie on a circle show that $m_1m_2m_3m_4= 1$
my solution:
(1) construct two lines $L_1:y=x\,\, and \,\,L_2: y=-x$
(2) construct $xy=1$
(3) construct a circle $x^2+y^2=k^2 \,\, (k>0)$
here $k$ big enough ,make sure (2) and (3) will have four intersetions A,B,C,D
(4)coordinates :$A(m_1,\dfrac{1}{m_1}), D(m_4,\dfrac{1}{m_4}),B(m_2,\dfrac{1}{m_2}), C(m_3,\dfrac{1}{m_3})$
(infact ABCD is a rectangle)
$\overline {AD}//L_1,\overline{BC}//L_1$
$\overline {AB}//L_2,\overline{CD}//L_2$
now we must have $m_1+m_3=0,m_2+m_4=0$
and $m_1\times m_4=-1,m_2\times m_3=-1$
$\therefore m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$
 
Albert said:
my solution:
(1) construct two lines $L_1:y=x\,\, and \,\,L_2: y=-x$
(2) construct $xy=1$
(3) construct a circle $x^2+y^2=k^2 \,\, (k>0)$
here $k$ big enough ,make sure (2) and (3) will have four intersetions A,B,C,D
(4)coordinates :$A(m_1,\dfrac{1}{m_1}), D(m_4,\dfrac{1}{m_4}),B(m_2,\dfrac{1}{m_2}), C(m_3,\dfrac{1}{m_3})$
(infact ABCD is a rectangle)
$\overline {AD}//L_1,\overline{BC}//L_1$
$\overline {AB}//L_2,\overline{CD}//L_2$
now we must have $m_1+m_3=0,m_2+m_4=0$
and $m_1\times m_4=-1,m_2\times m_3=-1$
$\therefore m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$
I never said that circle has centre at origin
 
kaliprasad said:
I never said that circle has centre at origin

I know you will question this ,it does not matter where the centre locate
if the origin translate from (0,0) to (a,b),all ther points will also translate relatively ,and the result will not change
 
Albert said:
I know you will question this ,it does not matter where the centre locate
if the origin translate from (0,0) to (a,b),all ther points will also translate relatively ,and the result will not change

it matters because shifting (0,0) to (a,b) changes $(m_r,\frac{1}{m_r})$ to $(a + m_r,b + \frac{1}{m_r})$ no longer reciprocals
 
kaliprasad said:
it matters because shifting (0,0) to (a,b) changes $(m_r,\frac{1}{m_r})$ to $(a + m_r,b + \frac{1}{m_r})$ no longer reciprocals
View the diagram:

View attachment 5564
 

Attachments

  • m1m2m3m4=1.jpg
    m1m2m3m4=1.jpg
    42.7 KB · Views: 101
Last edited:
Albert said:
View the diagram:

Albert, please attach your images here in the challenges forum inline so they can be hidden within the spoiler, and not show up as an attachment, outside of the spoiler defeating the purpose of using the spoiler tags. This can easily be done by using the "Insert Image" tool on our toolbar. :)
 
My solution
we have general equation of a circle
$x^2+y^2+ 2gx + 2fy + c = 0$
let a point $p,\frac{1}{p}$ be on the circle
then we get
$p^2 + \frac{1}{p^2} + 2gp + \frac{2f}{p} + c = 0$
or $p^4 + 1 + 2gp^3 + 2fp + cp^2=0$
or $p^4 + 2gp^3 + cp^2 + 2fp + 1=0$
the 4 roots are $m_1,m_2,m_3,m_4$ and hence product of roots = $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$ (the constant term)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
86K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K