Points on a Circle: Proving $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kaliprasad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Points
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the relationship $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$ for four points $(m_r,\frac{1}{m_r})$ that lie on a circle. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and proof techniques related to geometry and algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the problem of proving that $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$ given the points $(m_r,\frac{1}{m_r})$ for r from 1 to 4 lie on a circle.
  • Another participant attempts to provide a solution but does not include the details in the post.
  • A third participant also indicates they have a solution without elaborating further.
  • A separate post addresses a procedural issue regarding image attachments in the forum, suggesting a method for including images within spoiler tags.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion does not show clear agreement or disagreement on the proof itself, as specific solutions or counterarguments have not been fully articulated. Multiple participants indicate they have solutions, but these have not been detailed or compared.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of detailed mathematical steps or assumptions in the posts, which may limit the clarity of the proposed solutions.

kaliprasad
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
0
If $(m_r,\frac{1}{m_r})$ for r from 1 to 4 are 4 points that lie on a circle show that $m_1m_2m_3m_4= 1$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Perhaps something like this:

Let the circle be $$(x - a)^2 + (y - b)^2 = r^2$$.

The points $$\left( x_r , \frac{1}{x_r} \right)$$ are the points where (suitably selected) circle meets the function $$y = \frac{1}{x}$$. Substituting this into the equation of the circle gives a quartic equation:

$$x^4 - 2ax^3 + (a^2 + b^2 - r^2)x^2 - 2bx + 1 =0.$$

If one then further assume that the circle was suitably selected, there exists four real roots for that equation, namely $$x_1, x_2, x_3$$ and $$x_4$$, which are the numbers we are interested in. As they are roots of the quartic equation, one can write equivalently

$$(x - x_1)(x - x_2)(x - x_3)(x - x_4) = x_1x_2x_3x_4 + \ldots = 0$$.

Comparing these two ways to write the equation in question, one can conclude that $$x_1x_2x_3x_4 = 1$$.
 
kaliprasad said:
If $(m_r,\frac{1}{m_r})$ for r from 1 to 4 are 4 points that lie on a circle show that $m_1m_2m_3m_4= 1$
my solution:
(1) construct two lines $L_1:y=x\,\, and \,\,L_2: y=-x$
(2) construct $xy=1$
(3) construct a circle $x^2+y^2=k^2 \,\, (k>0)$
here $k$ big enough ,make sure (2) and (3) will have four intersetions A,B,C,D
(4)coordinates :$A(m_1,\dfrac{1}{m_1}), D(m_4,\dfrac{1}{m_4}),B(m_2,\dfrac{1}{m_2}), C(m_3,\dfrac{1}{m_3})$
(infact ABCD is a rectangle)
$\overline {AD}//L_1,\overline{BC}//L_1$
$\overline {AB}//L_2,\overline{CD}//L_2$
now we must have $m_1+m_3=0,m_2+m_4=0$
and $m_1\times m_4=-1,m_2\times m_3=-1$
$\therefore m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$
 
Albert said:
my solution:
(1) construct two lines $L_1:y=x\,\, and \,\,L_2: y=-x$
(2) construct $xy=1$
(3) construct a circle $x^2+y^2=k^2 \,\, (k>0)$
here $k$ big enough ,make sure (2) and (3) will have four intersetions A,B,C,D
(4)coordinates :$A(m_1,\dfrac{1}{m_1}), D(m_4,\dfrac{1}{m_4}),B(m_2,\dfrac{1}{m_2}), C(m_3,\dfrac{1}{m_3})$
(infact ABCD is a rectangle)
$\overline {AD}//L_1,\overline{BC}//L_1$
$\overline {AB}//L_2,\overline{CD}//L_2$
now we must have $m_1+m_3=0,m_2+m_4=0$
and $m_1\times m_4=-1,m_2\times m_3=-1$
$\therefore m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$
I never said that circle has centre at origin
 
kaliprasad said:
I never said that circle has centre at origin

I know you will question this ,it does not matter where the centre locate
if the origin translate from (0,0) to (a,b),all ther points will also translate relatively ,and the result will not change
 
Albert said:
I know you will question this ,it does not matter where the centre locate
if the origin translate from (0,0) to (a,b),all ther points will also translate relatively ,and the result will not change

it matters because shifting (0,0) to (a,b) changes $(m_r,\frac{1}{m_r})$ to $(a + m_r,b + \frac{1}{m_r})$ no longer reciprocals
 
kaliprasad said:
it matters because shifting (0,0) to (a,b) changes $(m_r,\frac{1}{m_r})$ to $(a + m_r,b + \frac{1}{m_r})$ no longer reciprocals
View the diagram:

View attachment 5564
 

Attachments

  • m1m2m3m4=1.jpg
    m1m2m3m4=1.jpg
    42.7 KB · Views: 102
Last edited:
Albert said:
View the diagram:

Albert, please attach your images here in the challenges forum inline so they can be hidden within the spoiler, and not show up as an attachment, outside of the spoiler defeating the purpose of using the spoiler tags. This can easily be done by using the "Insert Image" tool on our toolbar. :)
 
My solution
we have general equation of a circle
$x^2+y^2+ 2gx + 2fy + c = 0$
let a point $p,\frac{1}{p}$ be on the circle
then we get
$p^2 + \frac{1}{p^2} + 2gp + \frac{2f}{p} + c = 0$
or $p^4 + 1 + 2gp^3 + 2fp + cp^2=0$
or $p^4 + 2gp^3 + cp^2 + 2fp + 1=0$
the 4 roots are $m_1,m_2,m_3,m_4$ and hence product of roots = $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$ (the constant term)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
135K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K