Hi, I have a (maybe rather technical) question about the Hamiltonian formulation of gauge theories, which I don't get.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

With an infinitesimal symmetry on your space-time M one can look at the corresponding transformation of the canonical variables in phase-space PS. This can be done by a phase space function H[]:M --> PS. The generators of these symmetries give you global charges.

If I generate my symmetry with a vector field [itex]\xi[/itex] or [itex]\alpha [/itex], the statement which is often made is that

[tex]

\{H[\xi],H[\alpha] \} = H [[\xi,\alpha]]

[/tex]

In words: the Poisson algebra {} of the charges (LHS) is isomorphic (=) to the Lie algebra of the corresponding symmetries on your space-time (RHS).

My question is: why is this so natural to assume? Henneaux and Brown wrote an article about the details and adjustments of this assumption (central charges in the canonical realization...), but I don't see why this should be "natural" in the first place. I'm missing something here.

Thanks in forward :)

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Poisson brackets for Hamiltonian descriptions

Loading...

Similar Threads - Poisson brackets Hamiltonian | Date |
---|---|

Poisson, Einstein, Weak Energy Condition | Dec 27, 2015 |

Poisson bracket and Electric and Magnetic Weyl tensor in GR | Jul 31, 2013 |

Relativistci poisson brackets | Oct 15, 2009 |

Defining GR with Poisson Bracket | Nov 11, 2006 |

Poisson brackets in general relativity | Oct 2, 2006 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**