Poisson Distribution - why are these different?

spitz
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[itex]X(t)[/itex] is a Poisson process with [itex]\lambda=0.2[/itex] events per second. What is the probability of zero events in [itex]45[/itex] seconds?

2. The attempt at a solution

[itex]\frac{45}{0.2}=225[/itex] ([itex]0.2[/itex] second intervals)

so [itex]P[X=0][/itex] in [itex]225[/itex] consecutive intervals is:

[itex]\left(e^{-0.2}\right)^{225} = 2.86 \times 10^{-20}[/itex]

or

[itex]\lambda = (45)(0.2)=9[/itex] events per [itex]45[/itex] seconds gives:

[itex]e^{-9} = 1.23 \times 10^{-4}[/itex]

Both are approx. zero, but they are way different. How come?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
spitz said:

Homework Statement



[itex]X(t)[/itex] is a Poisson process with [itex]\lambda=0.2[/itex] events per second. What is the probability of zero events in [itex]45[/itex] seconds?

2. The attempt at a solution

[itex]\frac{45}{0.2}=225[/itex] ([itex]0.2[/itex] second intervals)

so [itex]P[X=0][/itex] in [itex]225[/itex] consecutive intervals is:

[itex]\left(e^{-0.2}\right)^{225} = 2.86 \times 10^{-20}[/itex]

or

[itex]\lambda = (45)(0.2)=9[/itex] events per [itex]45[/itex] seconds gives:

[itex]e^{-9} = 1.23 \times 10^{-4}[/itex]

Both are approx. zero, but they are way different. How come?

The 0.2 is---as you stated originally--- the number of events per second; there is no 0.2 sec anywhere in the problem! In other words, 0.2/sec = (1/5)/sec = 1 per 5 sec. This is a good illustration of the old advice: always check your units (sec ≠ per sec).

RGV
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
56
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K