Poisson errors for the distribution of galaxies?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Poisson errors to the distribution of galaxies with varying mass in different density regions of the Universe. Participants are exploring how to implement these errors to assess the significance of changes in mass functions across different densities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, Taylrl, seeks guidance on implementing Poisson errors for their galaxy distribution data and questions the appropriateness of using such errors.
  • Another participant suggests that Poisson errors may be relevant due to the log scale used in the data representation.
  • There is a mention that for binned data, the Poisson error can be approximated as the square root of the count (sqrt(N)), raising questions about the simplicity of this approach compared to more complex explanations found elsewhere.
  • A participant elaborates on the characteristics of the Poisson distribution, noting that both the mean and variance are represented by the parameter lambda, and discusses its application in estimating errors for low observation counts.
  • Another participant proposes considering a two-sample KS test for comparing regions based on galaxy mass distributions, while expressing uncertainty about the direct applicability of the Poisson model in this context.
  • One participant expresses a lack of expertise in astrophysics and seeks clarification on whether the responses provided were helpful, indicating a desire for further input from Taylrl.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the application of Poisson errors, with multiple viewpoints on its appropriateness and implementation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to analyze the data.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential dependencies on the definitions of Poisson errors and the specific characteristics of the galaxy distribution data. The applicability of the Poisson model to the context of galaxy density measurements is also questioned.

taylrl3
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Poisson errors for the distribution of galaxies??

Hi,

I have some data regarding the distribution of galaxies of varying mass in different density regions of the Universe, from which I have a mass functions for each region. I would now like to introduce some errors so I can determine whether changes in the mass function with density are significant or not. I have been told that the errors I need to use are Poisson errors though I am not sure how to implement these. Does anyone have an idea? Your help is most appreciated.

Thanks!
Taylrl
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I am searching around and I think they are Poisson errors due to the fact that my axis use a log scale. Is this the case? :-s
 


I have found somewhere in another post on another site that when using binned data such as mine then the Poisson error on counting statistics is sqrt(N). Is it literally as simple as this as some places have very complex explanations of what the Poisson error is?
 


taylrl3 said:
I have found somewhere in another post on another site that when using binned data such as mine then the Poisson error on counting statistics is sqrt(N). Is it literally as simple as this as some places have very complex explanations of what the Poisson error is?

The Poisson distribution (PnD) is a single parameter distribution where both the mean and the variance is expressed by the parameter [tex]\lambda[/tex]. The standard deviation (or error) is just the square root of lambda. The square root of the estimate of lambda from a sample is called the standard error of the mean. The PnD is typically skewed in inverse relation to the number of observations. With a larger number of observations the PnD approaches the binomial distribution, a discrete distribution which approximates the (continuous) Gaussian.

Lambda is easily estimated by:

[tex]1/n \sum_{i=1}^{n} k_{i}[/tex]

The fact that lambda is both the mean and variance is useful in judging Poisson "noise".

I don't know your specific application but I'm guessing it has to do with using some kind of grid for measuring galactic densities over different regions of space. I don't know what the model is (large scale uniform, lower scale possibly Gaussian) but the PnD would be best suited for small numbers, typically less then 20 observations. One feature of the PnD that could be helpful is that the mass function can assign useful (not vanishingly small) probability estimates to 0 data values of n (no observations in a grid square) .
 
Last edited:


taylrl3 said:
Hi,

I have some data regarding the distribution of galaxies of varying mass in different density regions of the Universe, from which I have a mass functions for each region. I would now like to introduce some errors so I can determine whether changes in the mass function with density are significant or not. I have been told that the errors I need to use are Poisson errors though I am not sure how to implement these. Does anyone have an idea? Your help is most appreciated.

Thanks!
Taylrl


For data of the form "Region 1 has galaxies of masses {x1,...,xm} and Region 2 has galaxies of mass {y1,...,yn}" consider a two-sample KS test (or AD etc).

The Poisson suggestion may have come from an inhomogeneous spatial Poisson model of galaxy coordinates which I'm not sure is immediately applicable here.
 


I don't know much astrophysics and I'm not sure if bpet's or my responses were helpful. If the Poisson error is appropriate, I've found a few references relative to galactic distributions, but I think both of us would like to hear from you regarding your question first.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K