Polynomial bounded w.r.t supremum norm

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the boundedness of two families of polynomials, E1 and E2, with respect to the supremum norm on the interval [0,1]. The original poster questions whether these polynomials are bounded in this norm, providing specific forms for each polynomial family.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the properties of the polynomials, considering critical points and the behavior of the functions at the endpoints of the interval. There is discussion about the maximum and minimum values of the polynomials and the implications for boundedness.

Discussion Status

Some participants have suggested methods for finding maximum values, while others are questioning the assumptions about the behavior of the polynomials. There is an ongoing exploration of whether the polynomials are bounded, with differing views on the implications of their forms and critical points.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the polynomials are defined for natural numbers and are specifically evaluated on the interval [0,1]. There is mention of the supremum norm and its implications for boundedness, as well as the potential divergence of certain series related to the polynomials.

Somefantastik
Messages
226
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



E1 = {pn(t) = nt(1-t)n:n in N};

E2 = {pn(t) = t + (1/2)t2 +...+(1/n)tn: n in N};

where N is set of natural numbers

is the polynomial bounded w.r.t the supremum norm on P[0,1]?

Homework Equations



supremum norm = ||*|| = sup{|pn(t)|: t in [0,1]}

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the set is bounded on P[0,1] if I can show that the supremum norm is less than some constant for all n. Can someone give me some advice on how to show either polynomial is bounded or not?

I think E1 is unbounded, no matter your choice of t, since the polynomial's value will forever increase as n in increases. I feel the same can be said of E2 but I know this is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can answer this fairly directly, by computing the maximum and minimum values of each [tex]p_n[/tex]; because polynomials are smooth functions, the extreme values of [tex]p_n[/tex] on [tex][0,1][/tex] must occur at a critical point of [tex]p_n[/tex] or at one of the endpoints.

The members of [tex]E_2[/tex] share a particular property which will save you even this computation.
 
I'm not seeing the special property of E2. Its min value must be at t = 0 for all n, and max when t = 1, but I can't pin down a value for sup. It looks like an expanded function but it doesn't look familiar.

factoring out a t makes p2(t) = t(1 + t + (1/2)t + (1/3)t2 + ... + (1/n)tn-1), but I'm still not seeing the trick.
 
Last edited:
Also, at E1, the critical points are t = 0 and t = 1. At both of these points, no matter the value of N, the polynomial is zero. Does this mean that is my sup? That doesn't make sense to me b/c the shape of this function spikes in the middle between t = 0 and t = 1.
 
for E2, p'(t) gives the geometric series, which equals 1/(1-t) on the interval |t|<1. The second derivative is 1/(1-t)2 < 0

What can I do with this information? The series doesn't converge at either t = 0 or t = 1.
 
Somefantastik said:
Also, at E1, the critical points are t = 0 and t = 1. At both of these points, no matter the value of N, the polynomial is zero. Does this mean that is my sup? That doesn't make sense to me b/c the shape of this function spikes in the middle between t = 0 and t = 1.

If the function is zero at 0 and 1, and positive in the middle, then there must be another critical point between, no?

For [tex]E_2[/tex], put [tex]q_n(t) = t^n/n[/tex], so that [tex]p_n(t) = \sum_{1\leq j\leq n} q_n(t)[/tex]. Where does each [tex]q_n[/tex] reach its maximum absolute value? What does this tell you about the [tex]p_n[/tex]?
 
ystael said:
If the function is zero at 0 and 1, and positive in the middle, then there must be another critical point between, no?

yes, and it'll be a function of n, but as n -> inf, isn't the max value of the function going to diverge to inf as well?


For [tex]E_2[/tex], put [tex]q_n(t) = t^n/n[/tex], so that [tex]p_n(t) = \sum_{1\leq j\leq n} q_n(t)[/tex]. Where does each [tex]q_n[/tex] reach its maximum absolute value? What does this tell you about the [tex]p_n[/tex]?

qn reaches its max value at t = 1 => [tex]p_n(1) = \sum_{1\leq j\leq n}q_n(1) = \sum_{1\leq j\leq n}\frac{1}{n}[/tex]

so the value of this polynomial is the sum of this series and is finite and therefore this polynomial is bounded.
 
Somefantastik said:
yes, and it'll be a function of n, but as n -> inf, isn't the max value of the function going to diverge to inf as well?

That's precisely what the question asks you to determine.

qn reaches its max value at t = 1 => [tex]p_n(1) = \sum_{1\leq j\leq n}q_n(1) = \sum_{1\leq j\leq n}\frac{1}{n}[/tex]
so the value of this polynomial is the sum of this series and is finite and therefore this polynomial is bounded.

Bounded? Uniformly in [tex]n[/tex]? Look again.
 
ystael said:
That's precisely what the question asks you to determine.

I understand that, but I am not confident about my answer.

Bounded? Uniformly in [tex]n[/tex]? Look again.

you're right, I got mixed up with our indexes on our summation notation. Anyway, the sum of (1/n) to infinity is harmonic sequence which does not converge, and therefore THIS polynomial is not bounded. Am I getting close?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K