MHB Polynomials and Polynomial Functions in I_m = Z/mZ

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Joseph J.Rotman's book, A First Course in Abstract Algebra.

I am currently focused on Section 3. Polynomials

I need help with the a statement of Rotman's concerning the polynomial functions of a finite ring such as $$ \mathbb{I}_m = \mathbb{Z}/ m \mathbb{Z} $$

The relevant section of Rotman's text reads as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/4530In the above text we read the following:

" ... ... The reader should realize that polynomials and polynomial functions are distinct objects. For example, if $$R$$ is a finite ring (e.g. $$\mathbb{I}_m$$), then there are only finitely many functions from $$R$$ to itself; a fortiori, there are only finitely many polynomial functions. ... ... "

My question is as follows:

How, exactly (indeed, rigorously and formally) can we demonstrate that only finitely many functions from $$R$$ to itself implies that there are only finitely many polynomial functions ... ... indeed, how would we prove this statement ...Hope someone can help ... ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am reading Joseph J.Rotman's book, A First Course in Abstract Algebra.

I am currently focused on Section 3. Polynomials

I need help with the a statement of Rotman's concerning the polynomial functions of a finite ring such as $$ \mathbb{I}_m = \mathbb{Z}/ m \mathbb{Z} $$

The relevant section of Rotman's text reads as follows:In the above text we read the following:

" ... ... The reader should realize that polynomials and polynomial functions are distinct objects. For example, if $$R$$ is a finite ring (e.g. $$\mathbb{I}_m$$), then there are only finitely many functions from $$R$$ to itself; a fortiori, there are only finitely many polynomial functions. ... ... "

My question is as follows:

How, exactly (indeed, rigorously and formally) can we demonstrate that only finitely many functions from $$R$$ to itself implies that there are only finitely many polynomial functions ... ... indeed, how would we prove this statement ...Hope someone can help ... ...

Peter

If a set i finite then each of its subsets is also finite. Here we have the set of all the functions mapping $R$ into $R$ finite if $R$ is finite. A polynomial function is, in particular, a function.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top