Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,920
- 48
I am reading Joseph J.Rotman's book, A First Course in Abstract Algebra.
I am currently focused on Section 3. Polynomials
I need help with the a statement of Rotman's concerning the polynomial functions of a finite ring such as $$ \mathbb{I}_m = \mathbb{Z}/ m \mathbb{Z} $$
The relevant section of Rotman's text reads as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/4530In the above text we read the following:
" ... ... The reader should realize that polynomials and polynomial functions are distinct objects. For example, if $$R$$ is a finite ring (e.g. $$\mathbb{I}_m$$), then there are only finitely many functions from $$R$$ to itself; a fortiori, there are only finitely many polynomial functions. ... ... "
My question is as follows:
How, exactly (indeed, rigorously and formally) can we demonstrate that only finitely many functions from $$R$$ to itself implies that there are only finitely many polynomial functions ... ... indeed, how would we prove this statement ...Hope someone can help ... ...
Peter
I am currently focused on Section 3. Polynomials
I need help with the a statement of Rotman's concerning the polynomial functions of a finite ring such as $$ \mathbb{I}_m = \mathbb{Z}/ m \mathbb{Z} $$
The relevant section of Rotman's text reads as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/4530In the above text we read the following:
" ... ... The reader should realize that polynomials and polynomial functions are distinct objects. For example, if $$R$$ is a finite ring (e.g. $$\mathbb{I}_m$$), then there are only finitely many functions from $$R$$ to itself; a fortiori, there are only finitely many polynomial functions. ... ... "
My question is as follows:
How, exactly (indeed, rigorously and formally) can we demonstrate that only finitely many functions from $$R$$ to itself implies that there are only finitely many polynomial functions ... ... indeed, how would we prove this statement ...Hope someone can help ... ...
Peter