Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around feedback on a portfolio created by an undergraduate in computer science, aimed at enhancing job and internship applications. Participants provide critiques on the portfolio's design and language, exploring the appropriateness of informal language in professional contexts.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- One participant expresses concern that the portfolio cannot replace a CV for serious job applications, citing poor English and informal language as issues.
- The original poster acknowledges the use of informal language like "wanna," arguing it is commonly used and aims to create a conversational tone.
- Another participant challenges the appropriateness of using "wanna," stating it is associated with unprofessionalism and suggesting it should be removed.
- A participant notes that unless applying to a casual company, the use of slang may be viewed negatively by employers, emphasizing the importance of professionalism in applications.
- One contributor suggests that while creativity can be beneficial for certain roles, a more conventional approach is necessary for computer science graduates, highlighting the competitive nature of job applications.
- Advice is given to research industry standards for CVs and to utilize university career counseling resources for guidance.
- A personal account is shared about the hiring process, illustrating the harsh realities of resume screening and the preference for standard formats over creative designs.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally disagree on the appropriateness of informal language in the portfolio. While some argue for a more casual tone, others insist on the necessity of professionalism in job applications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to portfolio presentation.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include varying definitions of professionalism across different industries, the subjective nature of design preferences, and the potential impact of informal language on hiring perceptions.