Position-momentum commutation relation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jety89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutation Relation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the position-momentum commutation relation in quantum mechanics, specifically the expression \(x p - p x = i \hbar\). Participants explore its origins, implications, and the physical meaning of multiplying position and momentum operators, addressing both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the commutation relation is not derived from a specific experiment but rather follows from symmetry considerations and principles of relativity.
  • Others argue that the order of measurement affects outcomes, indicating that non-commuting operators lead to different results depending on the sequence of measurements.
  • A participant mentions Ehrenfest's theorem as a way to relate quantum observables to classical mechanics, suggesting that average values obey classical equations of motion.
  • One contribution emphasizes that the commutation relation can be understood through the uncertainty principle, which states that precise measurements of position and momentum cannot be simultaneously achieved.
  • Another participant notes that Heisenberg's original interpretation of the relation involved the disturbance caused by measurements, while contemporary views may differ, focusing more on mathematical derivations rather than measurement disturbance.
  • It is mentioned that the commutation relation can be derived from calculus relations and the operator for momentum introduced by Schrödinger.
  • A suggestion is made to consult group theory literature for deeper insights into the canonical commutation relations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the origins and implications of the commutation relation, with no consensus reached regarding its experimental basis or interpretation. Multiple competing perspectives remain on the significance of measurement order and the relationship to classical mechanics.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on interpretations of quantum mechanics, unresolved assumptions about measurement effects, and the varying perspectives on the historical context of the commutation relation.

jety89
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi,

what is the physics experiment that leads to the position-momentum commutation
relation

xpx - px x = i hbar

What does it mean to multiply the position and momentum operators of a particle?
What is the corresponding physical quantity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interestingly its not really an experimental thing as far as I know - others more into experimental stuff may correct me on that though.

It follows quite easily from the position and momentum operator. Believe it or not they follows from symmetry considerations via the principle of relativity so isn't really a separate axiom, but a result of a well accepted principle.

Multiplying them together is simply applying an operator then another - in and of itself its doesn't mean anything.

However there is a reason those commutation type relations tend to occur:
http://bolvan.ph.utexas.edu/~vadim/classes/2013s/brackets.pdf

Thanks
Bill
 
In addition to the relationship between the quantum commutator and the classical Poisson bracket that bhobba metions, another (related) way to see that these classical sounding names are appropriate for the quantum observables is by Ehrenfest's theorem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ehrenfest_theorem, where the average values of the variables obey the classical equations of motion.

One way to understand the meaning of the commutator is to derive the uncertainty principle from it http://www.eng.fsu.edu/~dommelen/quantum/style_a/commute.html. The uncertainty principle says that if one measures position accurately from an ensemble prepared in a particular quantum state, and if one measures momentum accurately from an ensemble prepared in the same quantum state, the product of the standard deviations of the position results and momentum results is greater than zero.
 
Last edited:
I have come to understand it's the order in which you measure them in. If they commute it makes no difference, but if they don't you won't get the same result if you measure p then x or x then p. Generally the standard deviation of this difference is hbar.
 
jety89 said:
Hi,

what is the physics experiment that leads to the position-momentum commutation
relation

xpx - px x = i hbar

What does it mean to multiply the position and momentum operators of a particle?
What is the corresponding physical quantity?

There's not a single experiment. It is based on the general observation that in quantum experiments there exists certain pairs of quantities wherein the order in which you measure them affects the final outcome.
 
jety89 said:
Hi,

what is the physics experiment that leads to the position-momentum commutation
relation

xpx - px x = i hbar

What does it mean to multiply the position and momentum operators of a particle?
What is the corresponding physical quantity?

There is no experiment. It was the other way around. Heisenberg played with matrices and came to the conclusion that his infinite matrices ##P## (connected to momentum) and ##X## (connected to position) should obey algebraic relation

$$
XP - PX = i\hbar.
$$

In those days this was thought to imply that this description does not allow knowledge of both position and momentum at the same time. So Heisenberg attempted to save the new formalism by interpreting this in his thought experiments by saying something as "look, if we measure position, then we disturb the particle so that momentum afterwards is not determined but will vary case to case so we cannot know both position and momentum after the measurement" and similarly for measuring position first and then momentum.

Nowadays, the above commutation relation is viewed differently among physicists than Heisenberg tried to explain it, but most probably most of them agree that the relation has little to do with disturbance caused by measurements. One prosaic view is that all that is needed to derive the commutation relation is the calculus relation
$$
x (\partial_x \psi) -\partial_x(x\psi) = -\psi
$$
and the operator for momentum
$$
\hat{p}_x =- i\hbar \partial_x
$$
introduced by Schroedinger. Schroedinger also showed how the Heisenberg matrices and their commutation relation follow from the Schroedinger equation and these formulae in his papers from 1925-1927.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you guys, You gave Me food for thought.
 
If you consult a book on group theory (for physicists), you might find some very interesting discussions which lead to the canonical commutation relations. It seems the more you learn the more things become "obvious".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
950
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K