Position of a train engine (Locomotive)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The most efficient position for a train engine is at the front of the train, as trains operate effectively in tension and poorly in compression. This configuration allows for better control and visibility, especially on routes with curves and slopes. While energetic principles suggest that the work done remains constant regardless of engine placement, the design of 'Push-Pull' trains addresses operational flexibility rather than efficiency. The discussion highlights the importance of considering physical principles such as tension and compression in train dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of train dynamics and physics
  • Familiarity with tension and compression forces
  • Basic knowledge of train configurations, including 'Push-Pull' systems
  • Awareness of factors affecting train performance, such as air resistance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of tension and compression in mechanical systems
  • Explore the design and operational advantages of 'Push-Pull' train configurations
  • Learn about the effects of air resistance on train efficiency
  • Investigate the impact of train weight distribution on performance
USEFUL FOR

Railway engineers, transportation planners, and anyone interested in optimizing train operations and understanding the physics of train dynamics.

Maor Hadad
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have a question about where's the most efficient place for a train engine -
Let's say a train has to do a some route back and forth, the route has curves and positive and negative slopes.
In real life - What's the best position for the enginge?

My intuition says it will be most efficient if it will always be in the front -
But when I wrote simple equations I found it doesn't matter -
Because I have neglected many things like compression and streching of the wagons, the air resistance, heat removal and so on.. I'm not sure about it.

Any Ideas?

Thanks/
 
Science news on Phys.org
Well, it does help to see where you're going. Hard to do from the middle or back.
 
Trains work well in tension but poorly in compression, keep the engine at the front.
 
Of course it does :smile:

But speaking in energetic terms - is the work (Force*Length [Joule]) will be the same,
no matter what's the configuration of the engine comparing to the wagons?

If so, why did the 'Push-Pull' train was invented?
Couldn't they just leave the engine in the rear part and add controles to the front?

Thanks
 
Jobrag said:
Trains work well in tension but poorly in compression, keep the engine at the front.

Thank you, Perhaps you can explain what's the 'physical principles' behind that?
 
Maor Hadad said:
Thank you, Perhaps you can explain what's the 'physical principles' behind that?
Think of a train as a length of chain if you pull it the links will follow, if you try to push it the links will bunch up and not control well.
 
Maor Hadad said:
If so, why did the 'Push-Pull' train was invented?
Couldn't they just leave the engine in the rear part and add controles to the front?
Those questions are largely answered in the article you linked...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
17K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K