I Positions of distant supernova explosions false?

Click For Summary
David Wiltshire argues that dark energy may be an illusion due to misinterpretations of supernova positions, asserting that time flows differently in various parts of the universe, which could affect measurements of cosmic expansion. Critics highlight that Wiltshire's assumptions diverge from mainstream cosmology, which is well-supported by observational evidence. The discussion reveals that while time dilation occurs near massive objects, its effects are minimal over cosmic timescales, suggesting that Wiltshire's model may not accurately reflect reality. Additionally, the proposed theories by Wiltshire and Barbour lack comprehensive experimental support and may not align with existing data, particularly regarding high-redshift observations. Overall, the consensus leans towards the idea that alternative models, while interesting, are unlikely to replace established cosmological theories.
  • #31
kiki_danc said:
If space-time has a third ingredient say space-time-kiki

Please review the PF rules on personal speculation. This is speculation and is out of bounds for discussion here.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #32
Thread closed for moderation, to review whether further discussion that is not speculative is likely.
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K