Positive Charge Induction on Insulating Sphere

  • Thread starter Thread starter freeofwork
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A positively charged rod induces a negative charge on a conducting sphere placed on an insulating surface through the method of induction. The conducting sphere experiences polarization due to the electric field created by the positively charged rod, resulting in a separation of charges within the sphere. The options of conduction and convection are ruled out, confirming that induction is the correct mechanism for this phenomenon. Therefore, the correct answer to the homework question is b) by means of induction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and charge interactions
  • Familiarity with the concept of induction in physics
  • Knowledge of conducting vs. insulating materials
  • Basic principles of electric fields and polarization
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of electrostatic induction in detail
  • Explore the differences between conductors and insulators
  • Learn about electric field lines and their effects on charges
  • Investigate real-world applications of electrostatic induction
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching electrostatics, and anyone interested in understanding charge induction and its applications in real-world scenarios.

freeofwork
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



By what method will a positively charged rod produce a negative charge on a conducting sphere that is placed on an insulating surface.

Homework Equations



a) by means of conduction b) by means of induction c) by means of convection d) none of the choice are correct

The Attempt at a Solution



I am guessing d because the rod will only be able to polarize... and if it was conducted the negative charge would flow to the rod which will leve the sphere positive...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
really 385 views and no response...?
 
hi freeofwork :smile:

well, it's obviously not conduction or convection, and i don't think it comes within the strict definition of induction, so that does leave d) :wink:
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K