Electrostatics: Charging a sphere by induction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of charging a metallic sphere by induction using a positively charged metallic rod. The original poster questions why electrons flow from the ground to the sphere during this process, contrasting it with a different scenario involving a negatively charged rod.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the behavior of charges in response to external fields, questioning the flow of electrons during grounding in different scenarios. The original poster seeks clarification on the contrasting outcomes of grounding in the presence of positive versus negative charges.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the nature of grounding and charge distribution, suggesting that the ground acts as an infinite source of charge. The discussion includes varying interpretations of how charges behave under different conditions, but no explicit consensus is reached.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication that the original poster may need to consider the appropriateness of the forum for their question, as some participants note the potential for warnings regarding direct answers in the Homework Help section.

harini07
Messages
79
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



this is a theoretical question.please consider the situation as follows:
we are charging a metallic sphere using induction phenomenon with the help of a postively charged metallic rod and while on grounding the electrons flow from the ground to the sphere rather than sphere to ground, why?

Homework Equations



while charging by induction, the part of the material being induced near to the inducing material gets opposite charge of the inducing material and the other half which is away gets opposite polarity which is same as that of the inducing material's polarity.

The Attempt at a Solution


lets say when we bring a negatively charged plastic rod to an uncharged metallic sphere, the part nearer to the inducing material gets positive charge and the other half is negatively charged.on grounding the electrons flows from the sphere to the Earth and now the sphere as a whole becomes positively charged. but in the aforementioned case, why does the electron flows from ground to the sphere? what happens in the two cases? please explain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ground is an infinite source (supply) of charge. When the neutral sphere is grounded, ground either absorbs or supplies electrons depending on the incident field.

If you took a positively charged object near the sphere, it will attract electrons on the sphere and the charges will distribute on the sphere such that the net field inside the sphere is zero. Since the incident field is from +vely charged object, electrons will be attracted from the ground on the sphere. These attracted electrons will neutralize the positive induced charges and the sphere will now have only negative induced charges.

If you disconnected the sphere from the ground, the sphere will have a net negative charge.

So, if the incident field is from +ve charge, electrons will flow from ground to sphere and if the incident field is from -ve charge, electroms will flow from sphere to ground.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: harini07
Thanks.It helped me :)
 
Well, it looks like I'm going to get a warning soon for providing direct answers in the HH section..?:)
It would be better if you posted such conceptual questions in general physics or classical physics forums..
harini07 said:
Thanks.It helped me :)
You're welcome!
Some mentor or SA will come with an even better explanation (and a warning for me:-p)..
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: harini07
cnh1995 said:
Well, it looks like I'm going to get a warning soon for providing direct answers in the HH section..?:)
It would be better if you posted such conceptual questions in general physics or classical physics forums..

You're welcome!
Some mentor or SA will come with an even better explanation (and a warning for me:-p)..
oh is it? yup i will do it in the future. *posting conceptual questions in classic physics forum. instruction noted.* :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K