Possible analytical solution of transcendental equation by an assumption.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analytical solution of the transcendental equation sinh(k)=(b/2)(1+(e^(-2kl)) under the assumption that bl >> 1. The conclusion drawn is that while an exact solution is unattainable, an approximate solution can be derived, expressed as E=Eo+(d/2), where E=-2cosh(k), Eo=-{(4+b²)^(1/2)}, and d=(2b²/|Eo|)(e^(-bl)). This approximation's accuracy improves with larger values of bl, indicating a direct correlation between the assumption's validity and the solution's precision.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transcendental equations
  • Familiarity with hyperbolic functions, specifically sinh and cosh
  • Knowledge of mathematical approximations and their implications
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics related to bound states in lattices
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of hyperbolic functions in mathematical physics
  • Study the implications of the assumption bl >> 1 in analytical solutions
  • Explore the concept of bound states in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the methods for improving the precision of approximations in transcendental equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working on problems involving transcendental equations and quantum mechanics, particularly those interested in analytical approximations and their applications in physical systems.

Azorspace
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to solve the next transcendental equation analytically (obviously for k):

sinh(k)=(b/2)(1+(e^(-2kl)))

making the assumption that (bl >>1). I think that is not possible, but in an article that i found,
they solve it by making that assumption, and they reach to the solution:

E=Eo+(d/2)

where:

E=-2cosh(k), Eo=-{(4+b²)^(1/2)}, and d=(2b²/|Eo|)(e^(-bl))

physically this problem corresponds to that of finding the energy of bound states in an infinite one dimensional regular lattice, with two embedded impurities.

Thanks everybody in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well... the solution they get isn't exact. But its precision is as great as the "goodness" of their assumption. In other words, as they assumed that bl>>1, as greater bl were, as precise their solution will be.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
950
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K