Possible explanation for the wave-particle duality ?

Click For Summary
The discussion explores a proposed explanation for wave-particle duality, suggesting that the interference patterns observed in experiments like the double slit are due to the interference of probability fields rather than the particles themselves. It posits that as particles move, their probability of being in certain locations changes, leading to interference effects that manifest as wave-like behavior. The conversation also touches on the complexity of wave functions and their representation as complex numbers, which complicates the interpretation of these phenomena. Participants highlight that modern quantum mechanics does not strictly adhere to the wave-particle duality concept, viewing quantum entities as described by probability rather than classical particle or wave properties. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of quantum mechanics beyond traditional interpretations.
  • #91
probert84 said:
Because that would explain why energy is quantized.

Energy is not always quantized.

But aside from that your logic escapes me.

First, before going any further, exactly what do you think energy is and why is it conserved?

Modern physics knows the answer to that, and when you do you realize a statement like you made is nonsensical, but before going any further let's pin down what you think it is.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
Under which circumstance is it not quantized ?

My definition of energy would be something like this:

<<Personal speculation deleted>>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #93
probert84 said:
Under which circumstance is it not quantized ?
Typically the energy of bound states are quantized, but the energy of free states are not quantized. So, for example, a hydrogen atom has a whole series of quantized energy levels, but once you add enough energy to separate the electron from the proton (ionization) the energy is no longer quantized.

probert84 said:
My definition of energy would be something like this:

<<Personal speculation deleted>>
With that, this thread is closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K