Possible title: When Does the Kernel of a Homomorphism Reduce to the Identity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conditions under which the kernel of a homomorphism, specifically in the context of Lie group homomorphisms like SU(2) to SO(3), can reduce to the identity, thereby making the homomorphism an isomorphism. It is established that while a homomorphism can be one-to-one with an identity kernel, it may not be onto, which is necessary for isomorphism. The conversation also touches on the concept of non-canonical isomorphisms and the impact of group actions on manifolds that can alter the kernel. The theorem stating that the quotient group G/ker(φ) is isomorphic to φ(G) is highlighted as a key point in understanding these relationships.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie groups and homomorphisms
  • Familiarity with the concepts of isomorphism and kernel in group theory
  • Knowledge of the specific groups SU(2) and SO(3)
  • Basic grasp of quotient groups and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of Lie group homomorphisms in greater detail
  • Study the implications of the theorem regarding quotient groups and their isomorphisms
  • Investigate group actions on manifolds and their effects on homomorphism kernels
  • Examine the concept of natural transformations in category theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in algebraic topology, differential geometry, and group theory, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of homomorphisms and isomorphisms in the context of Lie groups.

TrickyDicky
Messages
3,507
Reaction score
28
I'm centering on lie group homomorphisms that are also covering maps from the universal covering group. So that if their kernel was just the identity
they would be isomorphisms.
Are there situations in which the kernel of such a homomorphism would reduce to the identity? I'm thinking of situations where the groups act on different sp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not clear what your question is. You state that you know that if a homomorphism is an isomorphism then its kernel is the identity. You then ask "Are there situations in which the kernel of such a homomorphism would reduce to the identity?" Do you mean "are the situations in which the kernel is the identity but the homomorphism is NOT an isomorphism?

If that is your question, then, strictly speaking, yes. In order to be an isomorphism, a homomorphism must be both "one to one" and "onto". A homomorphism is "one to one" if and only if its kernel is the identity. But that leaves "onto". It is possible for a homomorphism to be "one to one" yet not be "onto".

However, in such a case, the homomorphism is "onto" a subgroup of the original range group and we normally then focus on the homomorphism being an isomorphism to that subgroup.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I'm not clear what your question is. You state that you know that if a homomorphism is an isomorphism then its kernel is the identity. You then ask "Are there situations in which the kernel of such a homomorphism would reduce to the identity?" Do you mean "are the situations in which the kernel is the identity but the homomorphism is NOT an isomorphism?

If that is your question, then, strictly speaking, yes. In order to be an isomorphism, a homomorphism must be both "one to one" and "onto". A homomorphism is "one to one" if and only if its kernel is the identity. But that leaves "onto". It is possible for a homomorphism to be "one to one" yet not be "onto".

However, in such a case, the homomorphism is "onto" a subgroup of the original range group and we normally then focus on the homomorphism being an isomorphism to that subgroup.
Hi, that was not what I meant, I had some problem with the editor and the question appeared cut.
I was going to give some example: consider the well known homomorphism SU(2)->SO(3), Since SU(2) is the Universal cover of SO(3) the only reason it is not an isomorphism is that its kernel has one more element besides the identity, -I, and my question is if there are situations where the kernel
of this homomorphism is reduced to the identity, amd therefore turned into an isomorphism. Like maybe wnen acting on spaces that are not vector spaces that habe isometries that reduce the kernel.
 
I'm not sure what you mean by "situations". Are you asking about group homomorphisms ##\phi:G\to H## where G and H are not necessarily SU(2) and SO(3), or are you asking specifically about SU(2) and SO(3)?

I suspect that whatever the exact question is, the best answer you will get is that there's a theorem that says that if ##\phi:G\to H## is a homomorphism, then the quotient group ##G/\ker\phi## is isomorphic to ##\phi(G)##.
 
Fredrik said:
I'm not sure what you mean by "situations". Are you asking about group homomorphisms ##\phi:G\to H## where G and H are not necessarily SU(2) and SO(3), or are you asking specifically about SU(2) and SO(3)?

I suspect that whatever the exact question is, the best answer you will get is that there's a theorem that says that if ##\phi:G\to H## is a homomorphism, then the quotient group ##G/\ker\phi## is isomorphic to ##\phi(G)##.
/
That was just an example that fulfills the conditions I stablished. By situations I mean there are group actions on manifolds other than the usual Rn that modify the kernel so that the quotient trivially becomes G/Identity.
 
Basically I guess I was trying to define a non-canonical or unnatural isomorphism, that is, an isomorphism that requires a previous choice, whereas canonical means: "distinguished representative of a class", particularly one that does not require making any choice; this is also known as "natural", as in natural transformation."
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
920
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
571
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K