Post big bang matter/energy distribution

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jarroe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang Distribution
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The distribution of matter and energy after the Big Bang was not uniform, contradicting the notion of a perfect spherical explosion. Instead, the early universe was filled with an infinite amount of hot, dense material that expanded and cooled over time, leading to the formation of stars and galaxies. The concept of branes affecting the universe's expansion lacks evidence, and there is no central point in the universe; every point can be considered as the center from its perspective. The analogy of raisins in rising bread effectively illustrates this expansion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmology and the Big Bang theory
  • Familiarity with concepts of cosmic expansion and density fluctuations
  • Knowledge of gravitational collapse in star formation
  • Basic comprehension of analogies in scientific explanations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of cosmic inflation on matter distribution
  • Study the role of dark energy in the universe's expansion
  • Explore the formation and characteristics of supermassive black holes
  • Learn about the cosmic microwave background radiation and its significance
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, physics students, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of the universe's formation and expansion.

jarroe
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
The matter/energy was not evenly distributed after the big bang is this correct? I like to think of the big bang as all matter/energy in a perfect sphere that explodes out perfect and symetrical, but the evidence proves otherwise I guess? Other branes pulling perhaps on our universe altered the expansion in different areas? The rate of expansion has increased over time making it difficult to extrapolate back as well I suppose?

Perhaps a supermassive black hole resides in the spot in our current universe where the big bang occurred due to its age and the probability that a lot of matter would have been in closer to the origin?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
jarroe said:
The matter/energy was not evenly distributed after the big bang is this correct?

No, the fluctuations at the beginning of the universe were responsible for allowing the collapse of hydrogen by gravity to form the first stars and galaxies.

I like to think of the big bang as all matter/energy in a perfect sphere that explodes out perfect and symetrical, but the evidence proves otherwise I guess? Other branes pulling perhaps on our universe altered the expansion in different areas? The rate of expansion has increased over time making it difficult to extrapolate back as well I suppose?

Your view would be incorrect. There would be no sphere of finite size that contained the universe, but instead there would be an infinite amount of very dense very hot material in every direction. The expansion caused this material to become less dense and cool over time, eventually resulting in the universe as it is now. As for branes, there is no evidence of them so I can't say much on that.

[/quote] Perhaps a supermassive black hole resides in the spot in our current universe where the big bang occurred due to its age and the probability that a lot of matter would have been in closer to the origin?[/QUOTE]

Nope. We do not believe there is a center of the universe. The hot dense material of the early universe is believed to be infinite in extent and without a center. If you were to place yourself at ANY point in the early universe and watch as the expansion unfolds you would see that from every point you are at, everything else expands outward from you. Like raisins inside bread in an oven as it rises. The nearer ones move away from each other at a slower rate than the ones further away, yet no raisin ever gets closer to another raisin. (See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Raisinbread.gif) Remember, it's just an analogy. Obviously the raisin bread has an edge and a center, but we don't believe the universe does.
 
Thanks for the info! Hard to comprehend, but it I think I get it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K