Potential anywhere inside a cube

  • Thread starter Thread starter andre220
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Potential
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the electrostatic potential within a cube with specified potentials on its faces. The cube has a side length of L, with different potentials assigned to each pair of opposite faces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of boundary conditions to find coefficients in the potential function. There is mention of the challenge in exploiting symmetry due to the differing potentials on the faces. Some participants suggest breaking the problem into parts and addressing each boundary condition separately.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various methods to approach the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the separation of variables and the need to handle the boundary conditions systematically. There is no clear consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity introduced by having all six faces at different potentials, which may affect the typical methods used for simpler cases. There is uncertainty about how to derive the constants and the values of k from the boundary conditions.

andre220
Messages
75
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


All six faces of a cube, of side length ##L##, are maintained at constant, but different potentials. The left and right faces are at ##V_1## each. The top and bottom are at ##V_2## each. The front and back are at ##V_3##. Determine the electrostatic potential ##\Phi(x,y,z)## at any point inside the cube. What is the value of the electrostatic potential at the center of the cube?

Homework Equations


Solutions are of the form:

##X(x) = A \sin{k_1 x} + B\cos{k_1 x}##
##Y(y) = C\sin{k_2 y} + D\cos{k_2 y}##
##Z(z) = E\sinh{k_3 z} + F\cosh{k_3 z}##
where ##k_3 = \sqrt{k_1 + k_2}##

The Attempt at a Solution


Normally, the case in which one or two sides are held at some potential, the symmetry is exploited to get ##k_i## and the prevailing constants. However, here, that does not seem to be possible here.

When: ##x =0, x= L##, ##\Phi = V_1##
##y =0, y= L##, ##\Phi = V_2##
##z =0, z= L##, ##\Phi = V_3##

However, I do not see how this get me any closer to finding, any of the constants ##A,B,C,D,E,F##. ##\Phi = X(x)Y(y)Z(z)##.
Thus for the first B.C.:

##\Phi(0,y,z) = (A\sin{0} + B\cos{0})(C\sin{k_2 y} + D \cos{k_2 y})(E\sinh{k_3 z} + F\cosh{k_3 z})##
##= B (C\sin{k_2 y} + D \cos{k_2 y})(E\sinh{k_3 z} + F\cosh{k_3 z}) = V_1##

and so do I just keep doing this and will eventually, get my coefficients? Regardless, I don't necessarily see how ##k_i## would be found.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is a linear PDE. You can solve for one inhomogeneity at a time and make a superposition of the solutions to find the full solution.
 
Okay, I take when ##x=0\implies## ##V_1##:
##A\sin{k_x 0} + B\cos{k_x 0} = V_1 \implies B = V_1## and I could keep going on like that for each of the six boundary conditions
But I am still not seeing how that would work. Plus I don't see how I could get the ##k##'s from this.
 
No. You need to split the entire problem into several parts, then solve each part separately, including the now homogeneous boundary conditions on the sides.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K