Potential difference between two points

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the potential difference between two points in an electric field, focusing on the relationship between electric field, force, and potential difference. The subject area is electromagnetism, specifically electric fields and potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula for potential difference, questioning the appropriateness of using a simplified equation versus a more general integral approach. There is also exploration of the correct parameters and bounds for integration along a specified path.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the equations and the necessity of integrating along a chosen path. There is an ongoing exploration of how to parameterize the integration and the implications of different paths on the calculation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of a non-uniform electric field and the need to account for the path taken when calculating potential difference. There is a focus on ensuring the correct bounds and variables are used in the integration process.

goonking
Messages
434
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


upload_2015-10-18_19-11-36.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



we know the electric field at A is 0, so the force is 0.

V = work / charge = U / q = F⋅D / q

the electric field at B is 4 times 3.6N/C = 14.4 N/C

since E = F/q, F = Eq

force, F = 14.4q at point b

V = 14.4q⋅d/q

the q's cancel, d is the distance from A to b which is 4.47

V = 14.4 ⋅ 4.47 = 64.39

is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
goonking said:
V = work / charge = U / q = F⋅D / q
"D" is the displacement, yes? This is supposed to be a vector equation, ##V=\frac{1}{q}\vec F\cdot \vec D## or just ##V=\vec E\cdot \vec D##

The other mistake is that ##V=\vec E\cdot \vec D## is not the correct equation. If the field were uniform (constant ##\vec E##), then it would be correct, but in general we must say ##V_B-V_A=\int \limits_A^B \vec E\cdot d\vec D## where the integral can be along any path from point A to point B. (##V_B-V_A## should be independent of the path from A to B, so you are free to choose whichever path seems simplest to integrate along.)
 
Nathanael said:
"D" is the displacement, yes? This is supposed to be a vector equation, ##V=\frac{1}{q}\vec F\cdot \vec D## or just ##V=\vec E\cdot \vec D##

The other mistake is that ##V=\vec E\cdot \vec D## is not the correct equation. If the field were uniform (constant ##\vec E##), then it would be correct, but in general we must say ##V_B-V_A=\int \limits_A^B \vec E\cdot d\vec D## where the integral can be along any path from point A to point B. (##V_B-V_A## should be independent of the path from A to B, so you are free to choose whichever path seems simplest to integrate along.)
If I take the path from A to B, should the lower and upper bounds be 0 and 4.47?
 
goonking said:
If I take the path from A to B, should the lower and upper bounds be 0 and 4.47?
But what will you integrate with respect to? dx? dy? something else?

If you want to integrate along the straight line path, you would need to introduce a parameter. Call ##\vec A## and ##\vec B## the positions of points A and B respectively. Let's call the parameter s. Then you could parameterize the position vector of the charge like this:
##\vec R=\vec A+\frac{\vec B-\vec A}{|\vec B - \vec A|}s##.
See, ##\frac{\vec B-\vec A}{|\vec B - \vec A|}## is the unit vector from A to B. So, when you move along the parameter s, you are moving along the straight line from A to B (and the magnitude of s represents how far you've moved from A).
Then we would have
##d\vec D = \frac{\vec B-\vec A}{|\vec B - \vec A|}ds##
and then we would integrate from ##0 \text{ to }|\vec B - \vec A|## (≈4.47).

Slightly simpler would be to use the parametrization ##\vec R=\vec A+(\vec B-\vec A)s## and integrate from s=0 to s=1. (See when s=0, ##\vec R=\vec A##, and when s=1, ##\vec R= \vec B##)You can choose any path you want though. I would suggest integrating along the path consisting of two straight lines, from (2,0) to (0,0), and then from (0,0) to (4,0). Then you can integrate with respect to dy for the first part, and w.r.t. dx for the second part.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K