Potential difference in a sphere relative to infinity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electric potential relative to infinity for a thin plastic spherical shell with a negative charge of -Q, specifically at a point located a distance a/3 from the center of the sphere. The discussion revolves around the application of the Shell theorem and the implications of the charge's sign on the potential calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the Shell theorem and the potential difference calculation, questioning the validity of the original poster's reasoning and the implications of the charge being negative.

Discussion Status

Some participants express agreement with the original poster's method while others highlight the importance of considering the negative charge. There is an ongoing examination of the integral's sign and its implications for the potential value.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential confusion arising from the charge's sign and the implications for the calculated potential. There is also mention of the need for clarity regarding the integral's evaluation and its physical interpretation.

dincerekin
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A thin plastic spherical shell of radius a is rubbed all over with wool and gains a charge of -Q. What is the potential relative to infinity at location B, a distance a/3 from the centre of the sphere?

Homework Equations



[tex]\text{$\Delta $V}=\int _{\text{initial}}^{\text{final}}{E}.d{l}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


since the potential difference between any 2 points in a spherical shell is 0, point B can be anywhere in the sphere (it doesn't have to be a/3 from the centre).

so if we take point B as a point, an infinitesimal distance away from the shell (still inside the shell)

then we can treat the shell as a point charge:
[tex]\text{$\Delta $V}=\int _{\infty }^a\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon }\frac{Q}{r^{2}}dr[/tex]

which just gives:
[tex]\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon }\frac{Q}{a}[/tex]i don't think this answer is right. So, wheres the flaw in my logic, and how are you meant to do this question?

(edit: the epsilons are meant to have a 0 subscript)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think it is wrong??

To be honest, I think that's the correct method. What you did was basically apply the Shell theorem and it does hold for any spherical shell with symmetric charge density...
 
well, i thought my answer was too simple/easy to be right i guess.
 
You have to take into account that the sphere has a charge of -Q not +Q, otherwise it's fine
 
Sleepy_time said:
You have to take into account that the sphere has a charge of -Q not +Q, otherwise it's fine

there should be a negative sign before this integral and the charge is negative. two negatives make a positive

[tex]\text{$\Delta $V}=\int _{\infty }^a\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon }\frac{Q}{r^{2}}dr[/tex]
 
Yeah sorry, I just meant it for completeness I agree with the integral just if you do the integral you get an overall negative sign, which is helpful if you want to work out the work done moving this charge from infinity to a for example.
 
Looks good. But the integral of 1/r2 is -1/ r, so the answer will have opposite sign of what you wrote. The potential is negative near a negative charge.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
771
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K