Potential Energies of Two Charged Cylinders

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the potential energy per unit length of charged cylinders, specifically using the formula ##U = \frac{\epsilon_0}{2} \int_{entire \ surface} E^2 dv##. The energy density for a solid cylinder is derived as ##U_{in}/h = \frac{\pi \rho^2 R^4}{16 \epsilon_0}##, while the external potential energy diverges to infinity. The key conclusion is that the potential energy of a hollow cylinder is zero due to the absence of an electric field inside, yet energy is required to assemble the charges on the surface of the cylinder.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and electric fields
  • Familiarity with potential energy concepts in physics
  • Knowledge of integral calculus for evaluating energy equations
  • Experience with charged cylindrical geometries
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields for charged cylinders
  • Learn about energy density in electrostatics
  • Explore the implications of infinite potential energy in physical systems
  • Investigate the assembly of charges and its energy costs in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and researchers interested in electrostatics and energy calculations in charged systems.

Matt Chu
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Problem 1.24 (this is unimportant; it's just a different way of calculating the potential energy of a solid cylinder) gives one way of calculating the energy per unit length stored in a solid cylinder with radius a and uniform volume charge density ##\rho##. Calculate the energy here by using ##U = \frac{\epsilon_0}{2} \int_{entire \ surface} E^2 dv## to find the total energy per unit length stored in the electric field. Don’t forget to include the field inside the cylinder.

You will find that the energy is infinite, so instead calculate the energy relative to the configuration where all the charge is initially distributed uniformly over a hollow cylinder with large radius ##R##. (The field outside radius ##R## is the same in both configurations, so it can be ignored when calculating the relative energy.) In terms of the total charge ##\lambda## per unit length in the final cylinder, show that the energy per unit length can be written as ##\frac{\lambda^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\left(1/4+ln(R/a)\right)##

(It's important to note that the potential energy involved in this problem is NOT the potential energy of a particle in the field created by the charged cylinders, but the potential energy of the charged cylinders themselves.)

Homework Equations



##U = \frac{\epsilon_0}{2} \int_{entire \ surface} E^2 dv##

The Attempt at a Solution



The first part of the problem, involving solving for the energy of a solid cylinder, is pretty simple. For this, I got that the potential energy density per length of the inside of the cylinder being:

##U_{in}/h = \frac{\pi \rho^2 R^4}{16 \epsilon_0}##

The external potential energy of the cylinder goes to infinity, as the problem states, as you get:

## U_{out}/h = \left. \frac{\pi \rho^2 R^4}{4 \epsilon_0} \ln(r) \right|_R^\infty ##

The second part of the problem, though, is confusing to me. It would seem that the potential energy of the hollow cylinder is zero, because the electric field inside is zero. In addition, the problem says that you can "ignore" the field outside ##R##, but I'm not sure how exactly that can be possible if the total potential energy is the sum of the potential energies of the internal and external areas.

I thought that maybe I could calculate the potential energy inside the hollow cylinder by doing it piece by piece, i.e. with differential areas rather than with the equation given, but logically it should still be zero as well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Matt Chu said:
It would seem that the potential energy of the hollow cylinder is zero, because the electric field inside is zero.
It would seem that way. However, it takes some energy to assemble all those charges on the surface of a cylinder of radius R in a region of space where there was nothing initially.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K