Potential energy as a function of the square of this angle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the gravitational potential energy function, expressed as mgh(𝜃) = mg[(R+b/2)cos𝜃 + R𝜃sin𝜃]. The equilibrium point is established at 𝜃=0, indicating stable equilibrium when R>b/2. Participants explore converting this potential energy into a function of the square of 𝜃 using Taylor expansion techniques for cos(𝜃) and 𝜃sin(𝜃) up to the second order. The conversation highlights the confusion surrounding the interpretation of the second derivative in relation to force and energy calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy concepts
  • Familiarity with Taylor series expansion
  • Knowledge of derivatives in calculus
  • Basic principles of equilibrium in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Taylor series expansions for trigonometric functions
  • Learn about gravitational potential energy calculations in physics
  • Explore the relationship between derivatives and physical force
  • Investigate stability conditions in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the mathematical modeling of potential energy and equilibrium in physical systems.

Tony Hau
Messages
107
Reaction score
30
Homework Statement
Define the angle measured from the vertical to the line connecting the center of the
circle and the contact point of cube to the circle as 𝜃. Expand the potential energy as
a function of 𝜃 to the second order; i.e. 𝜃^2, around its stable equilibrium for 𝑅 = 𝑏.
Relevant Equations
U(𝜃) = mgh(𝜃) = mg[(R+b/2)cos𝜃 +R𝜃sin𝜃]
The problem of my question is the b part below:
1585890029251.png

I know that the potential energy is just the gravitational potential energy, which is mgh(𝜃) = mg[(R+b/2)cos𝜃 +R𝜃sin𝜃], derived from the geometry. The equilibrium point is at 𝜃=0 and the system is a stable equilibrium for R>b/2. However, I have no idea how I can convert the potential energy as a function of the square of 𝜃, as stated by the question.
 

Attachments

  • 1585890074811.png
    1585890074811.png
    13.6 KB · Views: 225
Physics news on Phys.org
Do Taylor expansion of
\cos\theta and \theta \sin \theta
in ##U(\theta)## up to ##\theta^2##.
 
mitochan said:
Do Taylor expansion of
\cos\theta and \theta \sin \theta
in ##U(\theta)## up to ##\theta^2##.
Thanks. It sounds reasonable! Here is the answer of the question. I am thinking why this method also works. Basically I don't quite get the logic behind. I know that the first order derivative of U is force. But I don't understand what 1/2 of the second order derivative represents.
1585900387935.png
 
Here is my solution for the two methods. They are inconsistent.
 

Attachments

  • 2020-04-03 16.44.03.jpg
    2020-04-03 16.44.03.jpg
    43.4 KB · Views: 237
The both coincide in the exact calculation. Please try again.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tony Hau

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
802
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K