Potential Energy between two protons?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential energy and kinetic energy relationship between two protons that are initially at rest and then released from a distance of 10 nm apart. Participants explore the conversion of potential energy into kinetic energy as the protons move apart.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equations relating potential energy to kinetic energy, questioning the use of mass in these equations. There are attempts to equate potential energy with kinetic energy and to derive the final velocity of the protons.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided calculations and expressed confusion regarding the mass used in kinetic energy equations. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between the potential energy of the system and the kinetic energy of the individual protons, with some clarifications being offered regarding momentum conservation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note discrepancies in calculated velocities and discuss rounding differences. There is mention of a potential confusion in the source material regarding the mass used in calculations.

MCATPhys
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Say you have two protons 10nm apart (at rest). If they are released, they naturally tend to accelerate away from each other. But what's the velocity after they are very far apart?

Basically, all the initial potential energy gets converted to kinetic energy. So I equal them to each other like this:

PE = qV = kq^2/.000000010 = 0.5mv^2

q is the charge of the proton, k is the constant, m is the mass (1.66*10^-27), v is the final velocity

When I solved it, the answer I get is around 5.3*10^3 m/s... but the right answer is supposed to be 3.8*10^3

Can someone please tell me what I am doing wrong... just the theory.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When they are very away both protons move with speed v each (this conserves momentum). What is an expression for the kinetic energy of two protons each moving with speed v?
 
I tried equaling the initial potential energy to mv^2 (with the mass being that of a proton) - and the answer is still wrong
 
Using mv2 for the kinetic energy is the correct way to go. Show what number you got and how and maybe I will be able to find out what went wrong.
 
(9*10^9)(1.6*10^-19)^2/.000000010 = (1.66*10^-27)v^2
v = 3725 = which is pretty close to 3.8*10^3 i guess

Is that the answer you are talking about?

But I don't understand why I would use the combined mass of both protons in the kinetic energy 1/2mv^2.

The potential energy should equal the kinetic energy of each of the two protons:
PE = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2mv^2 (m is the mass on of one proton)
PE = mv^2

But why do we use the combined mass for m?
 
MCATPhys said:
(9*10^9)(1.6*10^-19)^2/.000000010 = (1.66*10^-27)v^2
v = 3725 = which is pretty close to 3.8*10^3 i guess

Is that the answer you are talking about?
I got 3795 m/s - the difference is probably due to rounding off.

But I don't understand why I would use the combined mass of both protons in the kinetic energy 1/2mv^2.
Anything that moves has kinetic energy. Here we have two protons moving at the same speed. Proton 1 has kinetic energy (1/2)mv2 and proton2 also has kinetic energy (1/2)mv2. Their total kinetic energy is (1/2)mv2 +(1/2)mv2 = 2x(1/2)mv2 = mv2

The potential energy should equal the kinetic energy of each of the two protons:
PE = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2mv^2 (m is the mass on of one proton)
PE = mv^2
You are confused. The potential energy should equal the sum of the kinetic energies of the two protons. That's what
PE = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2mv^2
is saying.
But why do we use the combined mass for m?
That's because the masses are the same and the speeds of the protons are the same because of momentum conservation. If the speeds and masses were not the same, you would have to write

PE = (1/2)m1v12 + (1/2)m2v22.
 
I understand what you are saying... the initial potential energy should equal the sum of the kinetic energies of each of the two protons... which means..

PE = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2 mv^2 (but each represents one proton, therefore the m should be for one proton... why do we use the mass of both protons for m?)

btw... you are being very helpful... and thanks so much :)
 
nevermind nevermind - bit of a confusion in the book... now i get it... we were using the single mass only
 
btw... did you round off to get 3795 m/s - because i didn't do any rounding off
 
  • #10
MCATPhys;2724121... said:
PE = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2 mv^2 (but each represents one proton, therefore the m should be for one proton... why do we use the mass of both protons for m?)
I am not sure what you are asking here. In the equation, the symbol "m" stands for "the mass of one proton" and can be replaced with 1.67x10-27 kg.
 
  • #11
MCATPhys said:
btw... did you round off to get 3795 m/s - because i didn't do any rounding off
I did the calculation on a spreadsheet and got 3794.733192. I calculated

[tex]v=\sqrt{\frac{kq^2}{md}}[/tex]
 
  • #12
kuruman said:
I did the calculation on a spreadsheet and got 3794.733192. I calculated

[tex]v=\sqrt{\frac{kq^2}{md}}[/tex]

yeah - that looks right... but I'm guessing you meant q^2 in the above equation
 
  • #13
haha - u got it
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K