Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Potential Energy from an infinite line charge

  1. May 2, 2012 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    This isn't a real HW problem for me but just a question I asked myself and I am slightly confused by the solution I get. Here is the situation. You have an infinite line charge and a point charge q. Find the potential energy given to the point charge from the infinite line charge.

    2. Relevant equations

    Gauss' Law
    Work Formula

    3. The attempt at a solution

    Here is my solution.

    ∫E*dS = Q/ε

    Q=∫Q'*dL where Q' is charge per length integrated from 0 to L

    Q = (Q')L

    ∫E*dS = E*2∏rL

    E*2∏rL = (Q')L/ε

    E = Q'/(2∏rε)

    We know that F = qE so

    F= qE = (q*Q')/(2∏rε)

    Work done on a point particle to move it from the line charge to a distance r would be

    W = F*r = (q*Q')/(2∏ε)

    So my final answer is

    Potential Energy = (q*Q')/(2∏ε)

    My math certainly leads up to this answer but I am finding it slightly difficult to accept. I just feel that the potential energy should depend on the distance from the line charge to the point charge but this equation says otherwise. Am I doing something wrong or is my math right???

    Thanks
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 2, 2012 #2

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    hi hover! :smile:
    yes :smile:
    no :redface:

    W = ∫ F dr :wink:
     
  4. May 2, 2012 #3
    THAT makes more sense! I knew something was fishy when the potential had no dependence on the distance. The other equation I used can only be used if the force doesn't depend on the distance r which isn't the case here. Since F(dot)dr is equal to F_r*dr, the new equation would then be

    Potential energy = ((q*Q')/(2∏ε))*ln(b/a)

    where a is the starting position and b is the final position radially. The only staring position particle q can't have is where a = 0. I think this is the correct equation.

    If there is something I still missed, let me know but otherwise, thanks for helping me find my mistake!:biggrin:
     
  5. May 2, 2012 #4

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    what's wrong with being fishy? :confused:
     
  6. May 2, 2012 #5
    Ah yes, I see how this relates to your avatar! :P

    There is nothing wrong with being fishy as long as I can catch the fishies!... err I mean fishiness!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?