Potential energy in a mouse trap

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating potential energy in a mouse trap car using principles of physics, specifically torsion springs and Hooke's Law. The mouse trap is set at an angle of 180° (π radians), and participants explore methods to measure the force applied to the trap and calculate the energy stored. Key equations discussed include potential energy (U), work (W), and torque, with an emphasis on using SI units for accuracy. Participants recommend measuring force at various angles to determine the spring constant (κ) and potential energy accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Torsion spring mechanics
  • Hooke's Law
  • Basic principles of energy and work
  • Understanding of SI units for force and angle
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to apply Hooke's Law in practical scenarios
  • Research methods for measuring torque in rotational systems
  • Study the principles of energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Explore the conversion between imperial and SI units for scientific calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering courses, hobbyists building mechanical devices, and anyone interested in understanding energy calculations in spring systems.

Eirik
Messages
12
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


So I have been building a mouse trap car at my school, and I need to hand in a report on it tomorrow. :biggrin: I don't have all of the measurments at the moment, but the only thing I want to know is how to calculate this. I want to see how much energy is lost to friction/warmth/sound by dividing the total kinetic energy(I have figured that out!) by the potential energy.

The mouse trap is 180° or π rad from the closed position when it's set.
So
228647b7d4a18b6c8c0c390b439a61da8fafec76
=π rad
I only have the average speed.

Homework Equations


Potential energy in a torsion spring:
968f9659ad623d75a57358af25da79e7353c59a9

Hooke's law:
542d71db0e7fac8be72bc0651ed2734e4edf90fb

Work: W=F*s
Torque:
91e737c6cd7e5dcff24bfcc3344de3188185e7a3

426652ff2894f2a5d673257e24d4d537f76d0e64

The Attempt at a Solution


So at first I was thinking that that k must be equal to T /
228647b7d4a18b6c8c0c390b439a61da8fafec76
, and that T must be equal to the arm length times the average force used to set the mouse trap. k should therefore be k=T/π=(r*π*F)/π. Using the torsion spring equation, I then get U=(r*F*π)/2.

I then thought that the work in order to set the mouse trap should be equal to the potential energy. I used the circumference of a semicircle as the stretch. I then got W=F*π*r, but this is twice as much as I got with my other ""solution"".

I then thought that I might be able to just use that the X in Hooke's law is equal to the circumference of the semicircle. k should therefore be F/(π*r). Using the first equation, I then get U=(1/2) * (F/(π*r)) * π^2= (F*π)/(r*2)

I'm also not sure about how F should be measured. Should I take the force used when you're barely lifting the mouse trap + the force used when it's fully set and divide that by 2?

Sorry if anything was unclear!:confused: What do you reckon I should do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The (1/2)*k*theta2 comes from integrating k*
228647b7d4a18b6c8c0c390b439a61da8fafec76
*d
228647b7d4a18b6c8c0c390b439a61da8fafec76
. Note that the force necessary to hold the spring at
228647b7d4a18b6c8c0c390b439a61da8fafec76
is k*
228647b7d4a18b6c8c0c390b439a61da8fafec76
. Since you probably don't know what k is, replace k
228647b7d4a18b6c8c0c390b439a61da8fafec76
with (force), and integrate (force)d
228647b7d4a18b6c8c0c390b439a61da8fafec76
. Approximate this integral with a summation. If you have some fish scales (the kind which you hang the fish), then hook that onto the arm of the trap, and take some force measurements at equal angles. Try at least 8 to get decent accuracy - more if you can. You'll need a protractor. Use the midpoint or trapezoidal rule of sums. And you should pull at right angles to the moment arm (mousetrap arm). If not, then you are going to need to do some trig. Hopefully that should be pretty close to the amount of energy put into the spring.
As far as taking the average of the two extremes, that would be what I would do if no other options are available.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Eirik
You should measure the force, as you described, at the point where you barely lift it and then where it is fully cocked, then subtract the first force from the second one and divide that value by the number of degrees between those two points, that will give you the correct units for the spring factor κ in lbs/degree; and, multiply that by the square of number of degrees you measured between the two load points to get the potential energy U of the trap in its cocked position.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Eirik
Please note that I edited my initial post to read: "then subtract the first force from the second one" if you opened that post before I made my correction.
 
JBA said:
You should measure the force, as you described, at the point where you barely lift it and then where it is fully cocked, then subtract the first force from the second one and divide that value by the number of degrees between those two points, that will give you the correct units for the spring factor κ in lbs/degree; and, multiply that by the square of number of degrees you measured between the two load points to get the potential energy U of the trap in its cocked position.
Thank you! This was extremely helpful! However, won't pounds not being an SI unit affect the results? Souldn't I measure it in Newtons (or kilograms)? Same question for using degrees instead of radians.

I should also probably mention that I don't need this to be extremely precise by the way! :) We haven't really learned a lot about energy in school yet, so sorry if I seem extremely stupid haha.
 
Sorry about the units confusion, I am one of those USA people who has used imperial units all my life and still do. You should use the equivalent SI unit for force.
 
And for degrees as well
 
Eirik said:
Thank you! This was extremely helpful! However, won't pounds not being an SI unit affect the results? Souldn't I measure it in Newtons (or kilograms)? Same question for using degrees instead of radians.

I should also probably mention that I don't need this to be extremely precise by the way! :) We haven't really learned a lot about energy in school yet, so sorry if I seem extremely stupid haha.

Good point about the units. And looking back at your formulas, the spring constant (small kappa) for rotational spring has the dimension of Energy / angle, rather than force/angle as I originally thought.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K