Potential energy term in Schrodinger's equation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of potential energy in Schrödinger's equation, particularly in a one-dimensional scenario involving a charged particle and a parallel plate capacitor. The user seeks clarification on whether the effective potential energy for determining bound versus scattering states is influenced solely by the force component parallel to the particle's motion. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding how the direction of motion and the orientation of forces affect the behavior of particles in quantum mechanics, especially regarding transmission and reflection coefficients at potential barriers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Schrödinger's equation and quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with electric fields and potential energy concepts
  • Knowledge of bound states versus scattering states in quantum systems
  • Basic principles of particle motion in one-dimensional systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of potential barriers in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about transmission and reflection coefficients in quantum tunneling
  • Explore the role of electric fields in particle dynamics
  • Investigate the mathematical formulation of potential energy in multi-dimensional systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists studying particle dynamics, and anyone interested in the behavior of charged particles in electric fields.

iScience
Messages
466
Reaction score
5
consider a 1-D problem where a charged particle travels along +x with a bound state energy.
6fGwoRC.png


the vertical potential energy axis is displaying information about the force that is parallel to the particle's axis of motion. is this correct?

so then this would be an accurate representation?

mAkkj0p.png

where blue arrows represent E-field and the direction of force felt by a (+) test particle.
$$\lim_{ε→0}$$so if it's just the force component that is parallel to the direction of motion that determines whether the particle is in a bound state or scattering state, please confirm the following analysis is correct:

consider a charged ideal parallel plate capacitor:
tLuSrqG.png


(where the fields do not leak outside the plate area)

positive test particle enters orthogonally to the field. but because the acting force on the particle is orthogonal to its motion, the effective potential energy for determining bound vs scattering state, is zero.
but at the end, the particle has a velocity component parallel to the force, so it has a chance to be bound or scattered along this vertical axis.

is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm confused about what you're talking about. First of all, are you saying that the potential energy is zero everywhere except at two points? If the potential is finite at those points then they have no effect, quantum-mechanically. Or do you mean that the "force" is zero everywhere, except at two points?

Also, you start off saying that it's a one-dimensional problem, but then you talk about the direction of the particle's motion. If the problem is 1-dimensional, then there are only two directions possible: to the left, or to the right. (Or in the +x direction vs in the -x direction)

Are you getting your problem statement from some book? Should this be in the homework forum?
 
Should this be in the homework forum?
no this is purely for my own conceptual understandingultimately what i wanted to get around asking was imagine a potential barrier in R3.

jE7CNtt.jpg


the red and pink represent the paths of two separate charge particles (sorry i didn't mean to draw them as if they were actually crossing one another. the focus is supposed to be between the barrier and each particle considered separately).
each particle has the same kinetic energy. but see how one particle is incident to the barrier at an angle and the other particle is incident at a right angle?
i just wanted to ask if the transmission/ reflection coefficients are solely determined by the kinetic energy component that is orthogonal to the barrier.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K