Potential energy. What is the spring constant?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the spring constant (k) for an 8.00 kg stone compressing a spring by 10.0 cm. The correct formula for the spring constant is derived from the balance of gravitational potential energy and elastic potential energy, leading to the conclusion that k = 784 N/m. The initial miscalculation arose from an incorrect application of energy conservation principles, specifically when the stone was gently lowered to the equilibrium position rather than dropped. The correct approach involves recognizing that the hand lowering the stone removes half the potential energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy and elastic potential energy
  • Familiarity with Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Basic knowledge of energy conservation principles
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations for physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Hooke's Law and its applications in mechanical systems
  • Study the principles of energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Learn about the differences between static and dynamic equilibrium in physics
  • Explore the effects of different methods of lowering objects on energy calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and energy conservation, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to spring constants and potential energy.

Y*_max
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Figure 8-36 shows an 8.00 kg stone at rest on a spring. The spring is compressed 10.0 cm by the stone. (a) What is the spring constant?

2. Relevant formula
Mechanical energy is conserved

The Attempt at a Solution


The decrease in gravitational potential energy that occurs when the block is put on the spring (the spring is compressed) is equal to the increase in elastic potential energy of the spring.
Thus: mgh=0.5kh^2 (the coordinate system is chosen so that gravitational potential energy is zero when the block is at rest and the spring is compressed)
Solving the equation for k gives k=2gm/h
k=2*9.8*8.0/0.1=1568 N/m.

Yet, the answer turns out to be 784N/m :/
What did I do wrong?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The downward force on the force is equal to mg.
The restoring force by the spring in opposite direction is kx, equating
8g=k/10
K=9.8*8*10=784N
 
AbhinavJ said:
8g=k/10
K=9.8*8*10=784N
its 10 cm so you should take 0.1m , And you missed a factor of 2

Y*_max said:
The decrease in gravitational potential energy that occurs when the block is put on the spring (the spring is compressed) is equal to the increase in elastic potential energy of the spring.
not necessarily true! There is no diagram! Anyway, try equating mg = kx , you won't get the same answer! Was the body dropped suddenly or slowly lowered down to equilibrium?
 
Last edited:
Max' question "what did I do wrong ?" still stands !

You did an energy balance for a situation where all potential energy from gravity is converted into mechanical energy to compress the spring.
That would be: let go of the stone at the top of the uncompressed spring and see where the mass stops moving (i.e. the motion reverses direction). However, at that point the energy in the spring is enough to push the stone back to the original postition (again with potential energy mgh and no kinetic energy) where the sequence would repeat.

That is not what was given in the exercise. The stone was lowered gently until equilibrium position. The hand that lowered the stone took away half the potential energy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AbhinavJ
Suraj M said:
it's ## k=\frac{2mg}{h^2}##
No, it definitely is not. Max did the ##
k=\frac{2mgh}{h^2}## just fine, only the energy balance didn't apply for the situation described.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AbhinavJ
BvU said:
No, it definitely is not. Max did the k=2mghh2 k=\frac{2mgh}{h^2} just fine, only the energy balance didn't apply for the situation described.
I realized that 12 mins ago,BvU :smile: changed it, sorry!
 
Oh, I see! Thank you very much to you all!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K