Potential in a sphere in a dielectric

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 7K views
nagyn
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid conducting sphere of radius R and carrying charge +q is embedded in an electrically neutral nonconducting spherical shell of inner radius R and outer radius 2 R . The material of which the shell is made has a dielectric constant of 3.0.

Relative to a potential of zero at infinity, what is the potential at the center of the conducting sphere?

Homework Equations



V = ∫Edr = kq/r + C

Gauss's law in dielectrics: ∫KEdA = q/ε0

The Attempt at a Solution



I've made a few assumptions.

The field in a conducting sphere is zero, which means the potential in a conducting sphere is constant. Looking at just the sphere alone, potential at the center relative to infinity should be kq/R (positive because I'm going against electric field?).

With the dielectric in place to still take zero at infinity I need to take into account the potential difference across the dielectric (I think?)

Edielectric = q/KAε0

V(R->2R) = -∫Edielectric*dr (negative because I'm going in direction of electric field?) = -kq/Kr [2R - R] = -kq/2KR + kq/KR = kq/2KR

I know that a dielectric will decrease the electric potential, so I thought V = Vsphere - Vdielectric = kq*((1/R) - (1/6R)).

This is not correct and I'm not sure where I messed up.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rude man said:
Maybe more straightforward if you just integrated the E field from infinity to R.

So integral of E field from infinity to R = (integral of E field from infinity to 2R) + (integral of E field through dielectric).

From from infinity to 2R, can I still consider the system as a point particle and say the electric field is kQ/R^2? Or does that change with the dielectric in place?
 
nagyn said:
So integral of E field from infinity to R = (integral of E field from infinity to 2R) + (integral of E field through dielectric).

From from infinity to 2R, can I still consider the system as a point particle and say the electric field is kQ/R^2? Or does that change with the dielectric in place?
Answer this by applying Gauss' law to a Gaussian surface of radius r>2R.
 
EA = Qenclosed/E0

If I'm understanding correctly, a dielectric doesn't change the total charge enclosed, so Qenclosed should still be Q.

E = Q/AE0 = kQ/R^2
 
nagyn said:
EA = Qenclosed/E0

If I'm understanding correctly, a dielectric doesn't change the total charge enclosed, so Qenclosed should still be Q.

E = Q/AE0 = kQ/R^2
Yes, but I'm not sure why this thread has become so complicated.
A dielectric diminishes the potential difference across it. It exerts no long range field, so cannot affect potential gradients outside itself, as you confirmed by following TSny's hint.
In post #1 you found the dielectric layer reduced the potential difference across it from kq/2R to kq/2KR. What reduction in potential in the sphere is needed to keep the potential at infinity zero?
 
nagyn said:
EA = Qenclosed/E0
If I'm understanding correctly, a dielectric doesn't change the total charge enclosed, so Qenclosed should still be Q.
E = Q/AE0 = kQ/R^2
good thought!
but don't say "E0" when you mean ε0.