Potential in Concentric Spherical Shells

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential in concentric spherical conducting shells with a charge density defined in the space between them. The original poster presents a problem involving Poisson's and Laplace's equations in spherical coordinates, seeking to determine the potential in different regions of space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss solving Poisson's equation for the region between the shells and express uncertainty about the general solution for regions where the charge density is zero. There are questions about applying Laplace's equation and the appropriate boundary conditions for continuity of potential.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the original poster's attempts, noting potential errors in the equations and dimensions. There is ongoing clarification regarding boundary conditions and the implications of grounding the conductors. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and attempts to refine the understanding of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for boundary conditions related to the grounding of the conductors and the potential continuity across different regions. There is also a reference to a lack of information regarding surface charges, which may affect the analysis.

Nicolaus
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two grounded spherical conducting shells of radii a and b (a < b) are arranged concentrically. The space between the shells carries a charge density ρ(r) = kr^2. What are the equations for the potential in each region of space?

Homework Equations


Poisson's and LaPlace's in Spherical Coordinates

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved Poisson's Equation for the space between the shells, in spherical coordinates, and arrived at:
V(r) = (1/ε)kr^2/6 - (C1)/r + (C2)
where C1 and C2 are the constants of integration.
What would be the general solution for the potential in the other regions where ρ=0? Would I simply apply Laplace's equation in those regions, than apply the suitable boundary conditions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nicolaus said:
I solved Poisson's Equation for the space between the shells, in spherical coordinates, and arrived at:
V(r) = (1/ε)kr^2/6 - (C1)/r + (C2)
where C1 and C2 are the constants of integration.
Your first term on the right does not have the correct dimensions for electric potential.
What would be the general solution for the potential in the other regions where ρ=0? Would I simply apply Laplace's equation in those regions, than apply the suitable boundary conditions?
Yes, that will work.
 
I made a mistake, the equation in-between a and b should read: V(r) = kr^4/20 - c1/r +c2
The boundary conditions should be Vinside(a) = Vbetween(a) and Vbetween(b) = Vout(B) for continuity; am I missing any other conditions? I know there's the discontinuous derivative of potential = some surface charge, but I am not given such a surface charge.
 
Nicolaus said:
I made a mistake, the equation in-between a and b should read: V(r) = kr^4/20 - c1/r +c2
I believe the sign of the first term is incorrect.
The boundary conditions should be Vinside(a) = Vbetween(a) and Vbetween(b) = Vout(B) for continuity; am I missing any other conditions? I know there's the discontinuous derivative of potential = some surface charge, but I am not given such a surface charge.
I don't understand your boundary conditions. Perhaps it's the notation you are using. The usual interpretation of "grounding a conductor" is to set the potential of the conductor to 0.

The potential is continuous everywhere. As you say, the derivative of V will be discontinuous at a surface containing surface charge.

You will be able to determine the surface charges after you find V.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
870
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K