Potential on an Infinite Strip

  • Thread starter Thread starter treynolds147
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite Potential
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
treynolds147
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A potential satisfies ##\nabla^{2}\Phi=0## in the 2d slab ##-\infty<x<\infty##, ##-b<y<b##, with boundary conditions ##\Phi(x,b)=V_{s}(x)## on the top and ##\Phi(x,-b)=-V_{s}(x)## on the bottom, where ##V_{s}(x)=-V_{0}## for ##-a<x<0##, and ##V_{s}(x)=V_{0}## for ##0<x<a##, and repeats periodically outside this window.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So this is clearly a separation of variables problem, and I'm splitting into two parts - one which treats the bottom boundary condition, and one which treats the top boundary condition (while the opposite condition is set to zero). However, I feel really unsure of what I'm doing. So far I have the potential in relation to the bottom BC as ##\Phi=\sum_{n}A_{n}\sin\frac{n\pi x}{a}\sinh\left(\frac{n\pi y}{a}\right)##. I make no claim that this is entirely right. I suppose I'm not entirely sure how to set up the general function in the first place, or how to evaluate the coefficients while taking into account the periodic nature of the BC. Any nudges to get me started on the right foot?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your proposed potential will work fine for the full problem because of its symmetries, but not for the split problem where you put one of the boundary conditions to zero. Can you see why?

Once you have argued for that, you must fix the constants ##A_n##, what information do you have available for that?
 
I think I see why it'd work for the full problem. The sine term is going to give me something that falls on both the upper and the lower boundary, i.e. something like a square wave, right?

As far as fixing the constants is concerned, I know the condition that has to be met (i.e., that ##\Phi(x,-b)=-V_{s}## and ##\Phi(x,b)=V_{s}##. So it'd be a matter of doing an integral of the form ##\int V_{s}\sin\frac{n\pi x}{a}##, right? But the region of integration would have to be split into intervals depending on n to accommodate the changing sign of the constant as it varies from -a to 0 and from 0 to a, etc.
 
treynolds147 said:
I think I see why it'd work for the full problem. The sine term is going to give me something that falls on both the upper and the lower boundary, i.e. something like a square wave, right?

As far as fixing the constants is concerned, I know the condition that has to be met (i.e., that ##\Phi(x,-b)=-V_{s}## and ##\Phi(x,b)=V_{s}##. So it'd be a matter of doing an integral of the form ##\int V_{s}\sin\frac{n\pi x}{a}##, right? But the region of integration would have to be split into intervals depending on n to accommodate the changing sign of the constant as it varies from -a to 0 and from 0 to a, etc.

You only need to do the integration on one segment of the boundary since you have done a sine expansion.
 
Ah, I see, the sine already incorporates the periodicity. Let's see, calculating the coefficients then, we should have
##\int_{-a}^{a}V_{0}\sin\frac{n\pi x}{a}\,\mathrm{d}x=\int_{-a}^{a}\sum_{n}A_{n}\sin\frac{n\pi x}{a}\sinh\frac{n\pi b}{a}\sin\frac{n'\pi x}{a}\,\mathrm{d}x##,
which, if I did my integrals correctly, should give ##A_{n}=\frac{4aV_{0}}{n\pi}\frac{1}{\sinh(n\pi b/a)}##. And with the coefficients found, that should complete the potential expansion.
 
Ahhh, I see that now. Thank you so much for your help!