Is the Concept of Potentials Incompatible with Relativity?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the incompatibility of the concept of potentials in quantum mechanics with the principles of relativity. It argues that quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of the hydrogen atom, implies instantaneous information transfer when a proton is moved, contradicting the finite speed of information as mandated by relativity. The assertion is made that the true integration of quantum theory with special relativity lies in relativistic quantum field theory, which avoids the use of potentials. Additionally, there is a contention that non-relativistic Hamiltonians contribute to this incompatibility, as quantizing the relativistic Hamiltonian yields more accurate predictions. Overall, the conversation highlights the fundamental challenges in reconciling quantum mechanics with relativistic principles.
preet0283
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
please elaborate ..." particle quantum mechanics is valid in the nonrelativistic regime by definition ...it refuses to obey relativity ...this is not bcoz we write non relativistic hamiltonians bt the concept of potentials is untenable in relativity ...since it assumes the transfer of information at an infinite speed"what do we mean when we say that the concept of potentials is untenable
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the hydrogen atom problem in QM, in which you put the Coulomb potential in the Schrödinger equation. Now ask yourself what happens if the proton is moved suddenly? According to QM the electron knows about this instantly, without any retardation. For this reason the true merger between quantum theory and SR is not relativistic quantum mechanics, but rather relativistic quantum field theory, which does not use potentials.

I wouldn't agree with the part of the statement that says, "this is not bcoz we write non relativistic hamiltonians", because that is clearly part of the problem. And not surprisingly, when the relativistic Hamiltonian is quantized, you end up with a theory that makes more accurate predictions.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
545
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K