Power Factor & Transformer Load: 40kW to 100kVA

  • Thread starter Thread starter sandy.bridge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Terminology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the capacity of a single-phase 100kVA transformer supplying a 40kW heating load at unity power factor and the additional inductive load it can carry at a power factor of 0.8. Participants calculated that the transformer can support an additional 52.0618 kW of real power, resulting in a total apparent power of 65.0773 kVA. The calculations involved applying the Pythagorean theorem to a right triangle representing real and imaginary power components. The conversation highlights the importance of careful interpretation of electrical terminology and problem statements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of power factor and its implications in electrical systems
  • Familiarity with transformer ratings and load calculations
  • Basic knowledge of algebra and geometry, particularly the Pythagorean theorem
  • Experience with phasor diagrams and their application in electrical engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Study transformer load calculations and power factor correction techniques
  • Learn about the implications of inductive loads on transformer performance
  • Explore the use of phasor diagrams in analyzing AC circuits
  • Investigate the differences between real power (kW), reactive power (kVAR), and apparent power (kVA)
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, power system analysts, and students studying electrical engineering who seek to deepen their understanding of transformer load capacities and power factor implications.

sandy.bridge
Messages
797
Reaction score
1
Hello all. I recently read something that has me a bit confused. Consider a single-phase 100kVA transformer that supplies a 40kW heating load at unity power factor. What is meant by "how much additional kW of inductive load at 0.8 power factor can the transformer carry" mean? Is it asking how much more real power will the supply be transferring to the load given it is no longer unity?
Seems odd talking about a transformer "carrying" kiloWatts.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
40 kW at 1 PF is 40 kVA. 100-40 is 60. So how many kW is 60 kVA at .8 PF? Yes, that's real power.
 
(60 kVA)0.8=48 W.
Essentially they are simply wanting to know how much more real power the source can supply to a load with 0.8 PF given it is still supplying the unity PF heating load?
 
Thats the way I read it. It's asking how much additional load can be added to the transformer assuming all additional loads have a PF of 0.8.

So yeah, 48KW of true power will give you an apparent power of 60KVA at a PF of 0.8.
 
Last edited:
Word problems are best parsed carefully.
Word problem authors don't always give the facts in a logical sequence.
I don't know if that's because English is such a mishmash of Olde English, Latin and Old Germanic, but English works well enough if one is careful about transcribing it into equations...

First impulse is to leap to the answer -there's 60 kva of room left at .8 pf so answer is 48.

That was my first answer but i think it's wrong. Too much internet has made me impatient.

Going back to ninth grade algebra and geometry,
We started with just a line - no imaginary component.
Adding some kva at an angle changed our line into a triangle that represents our real(kw) and imaginary(kvar) and total(kva) components.

specifically, a right triangle whose hypotenuse is 100 kva
and whose two sides represent real and imaginary power,, kilowatts and kilovars respectively.

so :
let x = real kw to be added.
PF of .8 defines a 3-4-5 right triangle,
so if x kw of real power are added,
then (3/4)x kvar of imaginary power are added
and (5/4)x of total kva are added ;

the resulting right triangle has
real side (40 + x) kw
imaginary side (3/4)x kvar
hypotenuse 100 kva

so pythagoras says
(40+x)^2 + (0.75 x)^2 = (100)^2

which by quadratic equation gave me
x = 52.06183 kw real
and (3/4)x = 39.0467 kvar imaginary
and a quick check by windows calculator:

sqrt( (40 + 52.0618)^2 + (39.0467)^2 ) = 100

so answer could be 52.0618 kw added instead of 48 ...
(and 65.0773 kva instead of 60) .

would somebody check my thinking and algebra?

And is phrase "kW inductive load" an oxymoron, or am i nitpicking?

old jim
 
Last edited:
Yeah, this is exactly why I asked. I felt as though it was worded awkwardly; in a way that none of my textbooks have ever worded a problem. I see where you are coming from, though.
I drew a phasor diagram, ended up with two triangles, then applied Sine Law and ultimately ended up with the same result as you! Regards!
 
Thanks Sandy - diverse methods came to same number, so i am convinced it's right.

But what a wakeup it was for me to see how easily i leapt to wrong answer !

my self discipline needed a tuneup..

I wonder if that was a subtle choice of words, or did author make same mistake?

thanks

old jim
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K