1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Power, Force, Velocity and Acceration

  1. Jan 8, 2006 #1
    Is the statement below wrong?

    1. Assume a car is travelling on a frictionless landscape. The car engine has a constant power,P.
    2. The engine produces a force, which equals to the total resultant force act upon the car.
    3. F=ma. So the car should be travelling in acceration.
    4.Throught time, the velocity increase as there is acceration.
    5. Since P is constant, and P=Fv, F shall decrease as v increase. The total resultant force shall decrease throughout time.
    6. Acceleration will decrease.
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 9, 2006 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    This cannot be, in a "frictionless landscape" the car will not move.
    Given 2, 3 is incorrect. If the force produced by the engine equals the other forces (I thought this was a frictionless landscape????) Then there is on net force therefore no acceleration. At best, if we ignore, 1. the car moves at a constant velocity.
    No motion, no velocity, no acceleration. OR Constant velocity, no acceleration.
    Please explain P=Fv ? What is this? Where did it come from? What does it mean?
    There are so many incorrect statements that the last has no meaning.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Power, Force, Velocity and Acceration
  1. Power and Acceration (Replies: 4)