Power from both fusion and fission?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the principles of nuclear fusion and fission as sources of energy. It establishes that fusion can only yield net power output up to iron, while fission can only yield net power output down to iron, due to the binding energy characteristics of these elements. The highest binding energy is found in iron and nickel, which limits the efficiency of both processes. The conversation highlights the misconception that both processes can be utilized simultaneously for continuous energy gain.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear fusion and fission processes
  • Knowledge of nuclear binding energy concepts
  • Familiarity with elements on the periodic table, particularly iron and nickel
  • Basic principles of energy generation and thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of nuclear binding energy in detail
  • Explore the differences between fusion and fission reactions
  • Learn about the energy yield of various elements in nuclear reactions
  • Investigate current advancements in fusion and fission energy technologies
USEFUL FOR

Students of nuclear physics, energy researchers, and professionals in the energy sector seeking to understand the limitations and potentials of fusion and fission energy sources.

Jonnyb42
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
I haven't thought about it TOO much, but it seems that you should only get power from either fusing atoms or splitting (fissing?) them, but how come both? Wouldn't that mean you could continually fuse and split atoms for continual energy gain?

(My currrent thought against that is, that you can fuse hydrogen to any element, but cannot split heaver elements all the way down to hydrogen.
That "continual" process would end in Iron or something like that?)
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Fusion will only result in net power output up to iron, and fission will only result in net power output down to about iron. This is because Iron and Nickel have the highest binding energy of all the elements.

See here for more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_binding_energy
 
I see, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K