Power required for muscles to hold object up

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pythagorean
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics and energy requirements of muscles when holding an object stationary, particularly focusing on the physiological processes involved in muscle contraction and the energy supplied by ATP. Participants explore the relationship between muscle energy consumption and isometric contractions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests a mechanical analogy involving a piston and pressurized chamber to frame the question of muscle energy requirements.
  • Another participant notes that a typical human body requires about 2500 calories daily for various life functions, including exercise, and raises the question of incremental energy use when holding a weight.
  • A later reply emphasizes the mechanism of muscle contraction involving myosin and actin, mentioning that myosin hydrolyzes ATP to facilitate movement along actin filaments.
  • There is a specific interest in isometric contractions, with a participant questioning whether energy is needed to maintain muscle contraction without motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty about the specifics of energy requirements for isometric contractions and whether the bonds in muscle cells require continuous energy supply. Multiple viewpoints on the mechanics and energy dynamics are presented, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about energy consumption during isometric contractions and the physiological processes involved may not be fully addressed. The discussion references external sources for further exploration of the topic.

Pythagorean
Science Advisor
Messages
4,430
Reaction score
327
Is there a simple theory for this in terms of mechanics?

I'm not quite sure how to frame this. I guess you could look at it as a piston being held up by a pressurized chamber that has a constantly open release valve on it, but also an input valve that you have to keep supplying (to equal the release valves volume exhausted).

Do I have to go to the biology subforum now to find out if the bond holding my muscles together has to be supplied with energy (ATP, I presume) or the bonds would break and my arms would drop, much like if we stopped supplying the the pressurized chamber above?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I'm not quite sure what you are asking.

It takes perhaps 2500 calories daily of energy to power a typical human body...that includes exercise (work, as in force times distance) but the body also requires energy to maintain, repair and operate life functions...somebody must have typical data for such life maintenance functions..digestion, blood circulation, breathing, etc...

The issue you may be addressing is if one holds up, say, a one lb object the person will use more energy (calories) than if they were not holding such a weight. That's an incremental increase in energy and likely sports medicene or a related field would have observational data on such efforts over and above life functions.
 
Naty1 said:
I'm not quite sure what you are asking.

It takes perhaps 2500 calories daily of energy to power a typical human body...that includes exercise (work, as in force times distance) but the body also requires energy to maintain, repair and operate life functions...somebody must have typical data for such life maintenance functions..digestion, blood circulation, breathing, etc...

The issue you may be addressing is if one holds up, say, a one lb object the person will use more energy (calories) than if they were not holding such a weight. That's an incremental increase in energy and likely sports medicene or a related field would have observational data on such efforts over and above life functions.

Well, I posted this in the physics forum with the first paragraph in mind, but then kind of answered my question and had a second question in mind (second paragraph).

I'm more interested in the mechanism, not the numbers.

Like, if I'm holding a weight up, I'm obviously burning energy the whole time to do it, even though there's no motion. So what happens here? Are the bonds between the muscle cells temporary and must be supplied energy to keep bonded so that the muscle stays contracted?
 
Muscle contraction occurs via myosin and actin. Briefly, myosin hydrolyzes ATP in order to 'walk' along an actin filament.

Reality is a bit more complicated and this website is excellent:

http://people.eku.edu/ritchisong/301notes3.htm

You are asking about the physiology of an 'isometric' contraction

http://muscle.ucsd.edu/musIntro/contractions.shtml

None of the websites mentioned if isometric contractions are similar to stalling the myosin motor, but I think that's what happens:

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1366860
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
17K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
9K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K