Power Series Method for Solving xy`-3y=k Differential Equation

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the differential equation xy' - 3y = k using the power series method. Participants outline the process of expressing y as a polynomial and differentiating it to substitute back into the equation. They clarify that even with a non-zero right side (k), the method remains valid by equating coefficients of corresponding powers of x. The analysis reveals that for the left-hand side to equal the right-hand side, specific coefficients must be zero, leading to the conclusion that y can be expressed as y = -k/3 + Cx^3. The conversation emphasizes that this approach can be adapted for other functions by using their Taylor series expansions.
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
how do you solve
xy`-3y=k(constant)
using the power series method?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write y as a polynomial in x : y = a_0 + a_1.x + a_2.x² + a_3.x^3 + ...

differentiate y to get y'

Substitute for y and y' in the original de, analyse and solve !
 
@@ but there's an extra constant! usually don't you use that method only if the right side=0?
 
It comes out OK.

Write y as a poynomial
y = a_0 + a_1.x + a_2.x^2 + a_3.x^3 + a_4.x^4 + ...

Differentiate
y' = a_1 + 2a_2x + 3a_3x^2 + 4a_4x^3 + ...

Substitute
xy' - 3y = a_1x + 2a_2x^2 + 3a_3x^3 +4a_4x^4 + ... - 3a_0 - 3a_1x - 3a_2x^2 - 3a_3x^3 - 3a_4x^4 + ...
xy' - 3y = (-3a_0) + (a_1 -3a_1)x + (2a_2 - 3a_2)x^2 + (3a_3 - 3a_3)x^3 + (4a_4 - 3a_4)x^4 + ...

\mbox{substituting for } xy' - 3y = k,

k = (-3a_0) + (a_1 -3a_1)x + (2a_2 - 3a_2)x^2 + (0)x^3 + (4a_4 - 3a_4)x^4 + ... ----------------------(1)

Analysis
\mbox{For the lhs to equal the rhs, } k = -3a_0 \mbox{ (a constant) and all the other coefficents must be zero: }a_n = 0, n \in N, n \neq 0,3.

ergo,

y = a_0 + a_3x^3

or

y = -k/3 + Cx^3
============

As long as the original DE is made up of powers of x only (I think it would be difficult for trig functions and exponentials) then you're just manipulating the coefficents in the rhs of (1) to give your answer.
 
Last edited:
asdf1 said:
@@ but there's an extra constant! usually don't you use that method only if the right side=0?

You don't have to. Just write the right hand side as a power series also and set coefficients of corresponding powers of x equal. In the simple case that k is constant, you are just setting the constant terms equal as Fermat did.

If the right hand side were sin(x) or ex, you would write those as Taylor's series and set corresponding coefficients equal.
 
thank you very much for writing the steps out! it makes things very clear~ :)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K