Power Series Solution to a Diff EQ

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the first five terms of a power series solution for the differential equation y' + 2xy = 0. The solution involves assuming a power series form y = ∑(c_n * x^n) and manipulating the series to derive a recursion formula: c_{k+1} = -2c_{k-1} / (k+1). The user confirms that plugging in values for k from 1 to 9 generates sufficient coefficients to express the first five non-zero terms. Additionally, it is noted that an initial condition is necessary to define c_0, which serves as the integration constant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of power series and their convergence
  • Familiarity with differential equations, specifically first-order linear ODEs
  • Knowledge of recursion relations and their applications
  • Basic calculus, including differentiation and series manipulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of power series solutions for other types of differential equations
  • Learn about the relationship between power series and exponential functions
  • Investigate initial value problems and their role in defining constants in series solutions
  • Study the convergence criteria for power series in the context of differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying differential equations, as well as anyone interested in advanced calculus and series solutions.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
[SOLVED] !Power Series Solution to a Diff EQ!

Homework Statement


Find the first 5 term of a Power series solution of

y'+2xy=0 (1)

Missed this class, so please bear with my attempt here.

The Attempt at a Solution



Assuming that y takes the form

y=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}c_nx^n

Then (1) can be written:

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}nc_nx^{n-1}+2x\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}c_nx^n=0

Re-written 'in phase' and with the same indices (in terms of k):

c_1+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(k+1)c_{k+1}x^k+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}2c_{k-1}x^k=0

\Rightarrow c_1+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}[(k+1)c_{k+1}+2c_{k-1}]x^k=0

Now invoking the identity property, I can say that all coefficients of powers of x are equal to zero (including c_1*x^0)

So I can write:

c_1=0 and

c_{k+1}=-\frac{2c_{k-1}}{k+1}Now I am stuck (I know I am almost there though!)

Should I just start plugging in numbers for k=1,2,3,4,5 ? Will this generate enough 'recursiveness' to solve for the 1st five terms?

Is that the correct approach?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't worry guys, I got it. And for those who might make future use of this thread, my approach was correct. Solving

<br /> c_{k+1}=-\frac{2c_{k-1}}{k+1}

For k=1,2...,9 generates enough coefficients to write out the first five nonzero terms of the solution by plugging them back into

<br /> y=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}c_nx^n
 
Last edited:
I think you need one more initial condition on your series (example y(0)=x_0). You need to define c_0 (or you can just leave c_0 as the 'integration' constant of the ODE). However, the recursion formula becomes pretty obvious once you have that. If you can't see it right away, try plugging in a few values. Since c_1=0 what can we say about all the odd labelled coefficients? You should get something that looks like the series of an exponential function. In fact, the series will have a closed form solution if you can see how your answer relates to the exponential series.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K