Power supplied by AC component + DC component = total power?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating power supplied by AC and DC components in a circuit with a resistor. When a current source provides a sine wave with a DC offset, the power supplied by the AC component is calculated using the effective value (RMS). The total power absorbed by the resistor is the sum of the power from both the AC and DC components, exemplified by a scenario with Vac[rms]=200 V and Vdc=100 V, resulting in a total power of 5000 W. The calculation method involves integrating the square of the current over time, accounting for both AC and DC contributions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of AC and DC circuit theory
  • Knowledge of RMS (Root Mean Square) calculations
  • Familiarity with power dissipation in resistive loads
  • Basic calculus for integration of time-varying signals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of RMS values for signals with DC offsets
  • Learn about power factor and its impact on AC circuits
  • Explore advanced circuit analysis techniques using phasors
  • Investigate the effects of different load types on power calculations
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, students studying circuit theory, and professionals involved in power electronics will benefit from this discussion.

hsuy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question about ac component and dc component of a source. For example, there is a current source connected directly to a resistor.
If the current source supplies a sine wave with no dc offset, then I understand that power supplied by dc component is zero, and so power absorbed by resistor is the same as power supplied by ac component and dc component. ( in this case, power supplied by ac component is the same as power absorbed by resistor)
But what if the source supplies a sine wave with a dc offset? From what I understood, the power supplied by ac component needed to be calculated by using the effective value (rms). In this way, when I do the calculation, the power supplied by ac component is still the same as power absorbed by resistor; however, since there is a dc offset, there should be an additional power supplied by the dc component. Is that correct?
I feel really confused about this, hope someone helps me!

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can superimpose an AC signal with DC and sum the powers.

If you do it right, you can also calculate the RMS of a signal that has a DC offset. The RMS answer is not the same as one without the offset.

Just take any time varying signal, any shape, symmetrical or not, repeating or not, DC offset or not. Sample it in many small samples. Square each sample value, find the mean of the squares, take the square root of that. RMS means [square] Root of the Mean of the Squares.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
It is very interesting, I did the same calculation for an example:

Let's say Vac[rms]=200 V and Vdc=100 V and the load impedance it is a pure resistance of R=10 ohms.

If we take Iac=200/10=20 A and Idc=100/10=10 A and we calculate the dissipated power separately

then Pac=20^2*10=4000 W and Pdc=10^2*10=1000 W total 5000 W.

Let's take now the total current 20+10=30 A. Ptotal=30^2*10=9000 W.

If total current it is I=[(sqrt(2)*Vac*sin(ꞷ*t)+Vdc)]/R then the dissipated energy in a half of a cycle will be:

E= R∫I^2*dt|t=0 to T/2| where T=1/frq

I^2=[2*Vac^2*sin(ꞷt)^2+2*sqrt(2)*sin(ꞷt)*Vac*Vdc+Vdc^2]/R^2

and the energy E=integral{[2*Vac^2*sin(ꞷt)^2+2*sqrt(2)*sin(ꞷt)*Vac*Vdc+Vdc^2]/R}

in the interval t=0 to T/2 and the result it is:

E=[Vac^2*(1/frq/2)+4*sqrt(2)*Vac*Vdc/ꞷ+Vdc^2/frq/2]/R [J(W.sec)]

Replacing the proposed values above will result:

E=71.68 J and divide by 1/60/2 P=8601.6 W
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
NascentOxigen, this article is very interesting, indeed. However, in my opinion it is a mistake in one of equation. This:
upload_2018-3-18_20-8-6.png

it has to be:
upload_2018-3-18_20-9-2.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-3-18_20-8-6.png
    upload_2018-3-18_20-8-6.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 1,070
  • upload_2018-3-18_20-9-2.png
    upload_2018-3-18_20-9-2.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 1,080
Babadag said:
However, in my opinion it is a mistake in one of equation.
Yes, they do seem to have the wrong sign. Fortunately, it doesn't change their result. :cool:
 
I was wrong at the energy integral calculation in #4, because I considered only half a cycle and multiplied by 2. Because a.c. current change sign in the second half of the cycle, but d.c. current does not the total average is lower. So 5000 W it is correct answer. Sorry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K