Power vs BTU: Is There a Direct Relationship?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between power and BTU in air conditioning systems, exploring whether there is a direct proportionality between the two. Participants examine the implications of varying power levels, thermostat settings, and airflow rates on the efficiency and performance of air conditioners, with a focus on both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that BTU is a unit of energy, defined as power times time, and emphasize the importance of comparing like with like.
  • Others argue that air conditioners operate at a constant power level, with the heat they transfer being proportional to their power and the duty cycle dictated by the thermostat.
  • A participant questions whether power varies with adjustments to airflow rate or thermostat settings, suggesting that efficiency may decrease if power does not decrease proportionally when BTU/hr is reduced.
  • Some participants note that while air conditioners may perform better at maximum settings, there are limits where increased airflow can lead to diminishing returns in cooling efficiency.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of using different units of measurement, with some participants expressing confusion over the use of BTU/hr versus BTU.
  • A later reply highlights that the stated BTU/hr for an AC unit applies only under specific conditions, indicating that performance can vary significantly based on external temperature and other factors.
  • Participants also touch on the economic aspects of air conditioning usage, suggesting that people in extreme climates may not approach cooling as an engineering problem, contrasting it with heating practices in colder regions.
  • One participant introduces the concept of the Coefficient of Performance (COP) as a measure of efficiency, relating it to the Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER) but does not delve into a definitive conclusion about their relationship.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying viewpoints on the relationship between power and BTU, with no consensus reached on whether they are directly proportional. The discussion includes multiple competing views regarding efficiency, operational conditions, and the implications of unit measurements.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the performance of air conditioning units can depend on various factors, including temperature differences and specific operating conditions, which complicates the relationship between power and BTU. There are also references to potential limitations in understanding due to the complexity of the topic.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals involved in HVAC engineering, those studying thermodynamics, or anyone seeking to understand the operational efficiency of air conditioning systems.

techniker
Messages
39
Reaction score
2
Hi
Air conditioners power should vary with thermostat and fan/Airflow rate levels.
Is there data on Power vs BTU? Is it directly proportional?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BTU is a unit of Energy and Energy is Power times time. You should always aim at comparing like with like.
Afaik, AC units work at as constant Power level and the rate of heat they shift (per hour, say) will be proportional to the AC Unit's power times the proportion of each hour it's on for (thermostat duty cycle).
The effect of heaters and coolers will depend on the temperature difference they are working with - and even more so, in the case of a Heat Pump (AC), which performs better over a small temperature difference.
Could you be a bit more specific about your original question? What practical circumstances are you talking about?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: techniker
techniker said:
Air conditioners power should vary with thermostat and fan/Airflow rate levels.
Is there data on Power vs BTU? Is it directly proportional?
It doesn't vary a ton (get it!?), but it does vary a little: any decent air conditioner catalogue spec should list performance at varying conditions. Pick one and google and we'll go from there...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: techniker
sophiecentaur said:
BTU is a unit of Energy and Energy is Power times time.
That is true, but it is common to truncate BTU/hr to BTU.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: techniker
russ_watters said:
That is true, but it is common to truncate BTU/hr to BTU.
Really? So it's like Pounds and Pounds force. The imperial units really do need sorting out (or just to be left behind).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: techniker
sophiecentaur said:
BTU is a unit of Energy and Energy is Power times time. You should always aim at comparing like with like.
Afaik, AC units work at as constant Power level and the rate of heat they shift (per hour, say) will be proportional to the AC Unit's power times the proportion of each hour it's on for (thermostat duty cycle).

1. Does power not vary when you adjust air flow rate or thermostat level?

The effect of heaters and coolers will depend on the temperature difference they are working with - and even more so, in the case of a Heat Pump (AC), which performs better over a small temperature difference.
Could you be a bit more specific about your original question? What practical circumstances are you talking about?

2. ACs work at maximum power when air flow rate and thermostat levels are maximum, and cool with the stated BTU/hr.
When air flow rate and thermostat levels are not max, BTU/hr will not be max. Let us take BTU/hr to be 50%, what will power be? If it is higher than 50% then running the AC at lower than max will lower efficiency.
 
russ_watters said:
It doesn't vary a ton (1) (get it!?), but it does vary a little: any decent air conditioner catalogue spec should list performance at varying conditions (2). Pick one and google and we'll go from there...

1. OK, if the AC runs at lower than max, for 50% BTU/hr, it will have lower efficiency if power does not decrease by 50% (ratio of BTU/hr / hp).

2. I will look for that.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
techniker said:
1. OK, so an AC running at lower than max will lower efficiency.
Wait, lower than max what? At lower than max outside air temperature, it runs more efficiently, not less.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: techniker
  • #10
russ_watters said:
Wait, lower than max what? At lower than max outside air temperature, it runs more efficiently, not less.

max air flow rate/fan and max thermostat (=lowest temperature level in the control panel/remote control).
 
  • #11
Here's another one . When we talk about pounds pressure, what we mean is pounds per square inch (psi).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: techniker and russ_watters
  • #12
techniker said:
max air flow rate/fan and max thermostat (=lowest temperature level in the control panel/remote control).
Typically, more air means more efficiency, but there is a limit where fan energy starts going up faster than cooling energy goes down.

For the thermostat: warmer setpoints in the house make for higher efficiency with the system.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: techniker
  • #13
russ_watters said:
Typically, more air means more efficiency, but there is a limit where fan energy starts going up faster than cooling energy goes down.

For the thermostat: warmer setpoints in the house make for higher efficiency with the system.

This is beyond my knowledge level at the moment.
Maybe I should have said "ratio of [BTU/hr] / hp" instead of efficiency, and take room and outside temperature as constant.
 
  • #14
techniker said:
This is beyond my knowledge level at the moment.
Naa, we'll get you there.
Maybe I should have said "ratio of [BTU/hr] / hp" instead of efficiency...
Same diff. That's a power over a power.
...and take room and outside temperature as constant.
And varying what? Are you referring to the "normal/max" setting on an air conditioner? My assumption is that that only varies the fan speed and if that is the case, the efficiency is likely higher in the "max" setting.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: techniker
  • #15
russ_watters said:
Naa, we'll get you there.

Thank you mate!

Same diff. That's a power over a power.

True

And varying what? Are you referring to the "normal/max" setting on an air conditioner? My assumption is that that only varies the fan speed and if that is the case, the efficiency is likely higher in the "max" setting.

Yes. This is why it is better to run an AC at the max setting even if you do not need this much cooling.
 
  • #16
russ_watters said:
Yeah, and you can also get on a bathroom scale and read "kilograms".

Example:
https://www.google.com/webhp?source...spv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=air+conditioner+btu&tbm=shop
Hah. Nice try but it tells you what you actually want to know - your Mass - usually by inferring it from the force on a spring. But you don't know what's in the instrument. It could actually have a proper balance inside it and then the kg value would be direct. What would we do if our planet was significantly more oblate, I wonder?
This unit business is really quite important and Imperial measurements really don't make a lot of sense. The use of decimal currency was a sensible choice. The UK was dragged kicking and screaming in that direction a mere 40 years ago and the pint is now the only worthwhile unit that's historical.
But even with SI, we have people talking about kW per hour and a 10A battery. :smile:
techniker said:
with the stated BTU/hr.
An AC unit is a heat pump and the "stated BTU/hr" will apply only under certain conditions. Give it a divergent operating temperature range and the rate of shifting heat can be very different. It's very hard to quantify what's really going to happen.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: techniker
  • #17
An AC unit is a heat pump and the "stated BTU/hr" will apply only under certain conditions. Give it a divergent operating temperature range and the rate of shifting heat can be very different. It's very hard to quantify what's really going to happen.[/QUOTE said:
OK
That is good to know.
Thanks
 
  • #18
Good to know but it doesn't help your problem, I fear.
AC is expensive, the way that people seem to use it, even under moderate conditions. People living in Arctic regions treat building and heating with strict discipline. I get the impression that more people in extremes of heat do not tend to treat it as an Engineering problem but are prepared to throw money at it. Apart from the need for a pitched roof to shed snow, I would think that houses in both extremes should be built in much the same way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: techniker
  • #19
sophiecentaur said:
Good to know but it doesn't help your problem, I fear.
AC is expensive, the way that people seem to use it, even under moderate conditions. People living in Arctic regions treat building and heating with strict discipline. I get the impression that more people in extremes of heat do not tend to treat it as an Engineering problem but are prepared to throw money at it. Apart from the need for a pitched roof to shed snow, I would think that houses in both extremes should be built in much the same way.

I agree.
 
  • #20
Cooling power out can be divided by electrical power in to yield the Coefficient of Performance (COP), a dimensionless number.

COP is distantly related to Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER). The differences are that SEER calculates average efficiency over a typical summer (e.g. 125 900F days x 8 hours/day with indoor 800F at 50% humidity) and, due to inconsistent units (BTU/W-hr) SEER needs a conversion factor to express it as a COP.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: techniker
  • #21
David Lewis said:
Cooling power out can be divided by electrical power in to yield the Coefficient of Performance (COP), a dimensionless number.

COP is distantly related to Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER). The differences are that SEER calculates average efficiency over a typical summer (e.g. 125 900F days x 8 hours/day with indoor 800F at 50% humidity) and, due to inconsistent units (BTU/W-hr) SEER needs a conversion factor to express it as a COP.
To make life even more fun, engineers often prefer units of kW/Ton.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur and techniker

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
92K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K