Pψ=aψ and wave function uniqueness

mengsk
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I want to know whether the wave function of particle is unique? If not, could we find a ψ to rationalize the equation Pψ=Aψ, in which P is the momentum operator and A is a constant. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In case P is just an ordinary (in this case, first-order partial) differential operator, all the ordinary results for existence and uniqueness of a solution hold.
AFAIK, for the momentum operator the solution is unique (of course, up to a constant multiplicative factor, which can be used to normalize the solution).
Not sure what you mean by rationalize though?
 
mengsk said:
I want to know whether the wave function of particle is unique? If not, could we find a ψ to rationalize the equation Pψ=Aψ, in which P is the momentum operator and A is a constant. Thank you!

What do you mean by "unique" ? The wave function is, of course, subject to initial conditions and thus not unique in the usual sense. Nor is it unique when IC are completely specified, because it can still be gauge transformed.
 
I mean can we find a ψ to make the equation tenable?
 
mengsk said:
I mean can we find a ψ to make the equation tenable?

Yes, in the case you mentioned Psi is simply a plane wave. But this is not the general wave function of a particle. Particles interact and then their wave functions are not plane waves anymore.
 
Thank you very much!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
57
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
770
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
906
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top