Momentum of constant wave function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the momentum of a constant wave function within a cuboid volume under periodic boundary conditions. The key equations referenced include the Hermitian operator for momentum (p = -iħ∇) and the periodic boundary condition (ψx=0 = ψx=L). The initial analysis indicates that applying the momentum operator to a constant wave function yields zero momentum, raising questions about alternative approaches to derive non-zero momentum. A suggestion is made to consider the wave function as a superposition of eigenfunctions and analyze its time development through Fourier transforms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically wave functions and operators.
  • Familiarity with Hermitian operators and their role in quantum measurements.
  • Knowledge of periodic boundary conditions in quantum systems.
  • Basic concepts of Fourier transforms and their application in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of periodic boundary conditions on wave functions in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the concept of superposition of eigenfunctions in quantum systems.
  • Learn about the time development of wave functions using Fourier transforms.
  • Investigate the relationship between momentum and wave functions in quantum mechanics, particularly in confined systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying wave functions, momentum operators, and periodic boundary conditions in confined systems.

doktorglas
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1. The scenario
If we have a small cuboid volume embedded in a larger dito with periodic boundary conditions, and a wave function that is constant inside the former, while zero everywhere else; what can we then know about the momentum?

Homework Equations


I. Âψ = Aψ (A being the measured eigenvalue corresponding to the Hermitian operator Â)
II. p = -iħ
III. ψx=0 = ψx=L (Periodic b.c. for each of the three pairs of opposite sides of the larger cuboid)
IV. [xi,pj] = iħδi,j

3. The attempt
I'm thinking about the standard approach (I.) of measurement by acting on the wave function with the Hermitian operator corresponding to the quantity of interest - in this case the momentum, the operator of which is written just above (II.). Acting on a constant wave function the result is obviously zero (since we are differentiating a constant function), but I am not sure of what this really tells us about the momentum in general, for the above scenario. Is there any other approach that could produce a non-zero momentum (perhaps by utilizing (III.))? What about the discontinuity at the boundary of the inner volume?
 
Dear JLAN,

No responses so far, so I'll put in a suggestion.
Your ##-I\hbar\nabla## operator is awkward with such a wave function.
If you are already familiar with the particle in a box, perhaps you can make an inroad by considering the given wave form as a superposition of eigenfunctions for that potential (A set of plane waves) at t=0 and then look at the time development of the Fourier transform ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K