Precession of the LRL Vector in SR

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter utesfan100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Precession Sr Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the precession of the Laplace-Runge-Lenz (LRL) vector in special relativity (SR) when considering a charged mass in orbit around a much more massive oppositely charged mass under Coulomb's law. The participants explore the relationship between SR effects and classical mechanics, specifically questioning the amount of precession in SR and its comparison to the Newtonian model predicting Mercury's precession. The author proposes a formula for first-order SR precession and seeks clarification on solving a specific integral related to the motion of the orbiting body.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector in classical mechanics
  • Familiarity with special relativity principles and effects
  • Knowledge of Coulomb's law and inverse square forces
  • Ability to solve integrals involving square roots and trigonometric functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector in relativistic contexts
  • Study the derivation of precession formulas in special relativity
  • Explore the relationship between relativistic energy and classical mechanics
  • Learn techniques for solving integrals involving perturbations in orbital mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the intersection of classical mechanics and special relativity, particularly in the context of orbital dynamics and precession phenomena.

utesfan100
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
This is a continuation of https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=526249", now that my confusion on Thomas precession has been clarified and my root question has been shown to not stem from this effect.

In classical mechanics for any inverse square force, \vec{F}=-\frac{C}{r^2}\hat{r}, one has the Laplace-Runge-Lenz eccentricity vector. This is a constant of motion and has the magnitude of the eccentricity and points from the center of attraction towards the periapsis.

\vec{e}=\frac{\vec{L}\times \vec{p}}{mC} + \vec{r}

For the argument's sake, let's consider a charged mass in orbit about a much more massive oppositely charged mass under Coulomb's law (C=kQq), with a speed high enough that the SR effects are significantly larger than the effects of the curvature of space-time from the mass-energies involved.

Q1) How much precession would such an orbit have in SR? Is this twice the excess in the angle \theta given on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplac...lizations_to_other_potentials_and_relativity" evaluated between two consecutive apsis?

Q2) Is this the "Newtonian Model" that I have heard predicts half of the observed precession of Mercury (without clarification and attributed to Einstein), or does that model include a change to the inverse square law force due to the relativistic energy of the orbiting body? Half of the first order estimate of the DeSitter precession in GR would be \delta=\frac{3\pi C}{c^2rm_0}, C=GMm_0 and r being the semi-latus rectum of the precessing ellipse.

Thoughts) My guess is that the first order SR precession defined above is \delta_{SR}=\frac{\pi C}{c^2rm_0}, with an additional \delta_{E=mc^2}=\frac{2\pi C}{c^2rm_0} when the classical effects of Newton's theorem of rotating orbits is considered with the inverse square law adjusted by replacing the rest mass with the relativistic energy. I believe I have worked out the second half of this previously (http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/336k/Newton/node45.html" ), but need to relocate those notes. I may have the factor of two in the wrong component, or my guess might be completely off base.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it safe to assume that with no comment on this post in over a month means that no obvious error exists in my assumptions?
 
Speaking of that integral in Wiki, how do you solve an integral of the form:

\theta = L \int^{u} \frac{du}{\sqrt{m^{2} c^{2} \left(\gamma^{2} - 1 \right) - L^{2} u^{2}}}

I would be content with the limit as \gamma and L are nearly constant. Setting X=\frac{mc\sqrt{\gamma^{2} - 1}}{L}=\frac{mv\gamma}{L} gives:

\theta = \int^{u} \frac{du}{\sqrt{X^{2} - u^{2}}} = \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{u}{X}\right)\approx\sin^{-1}(1)=\pi

Now, if we have a perturbation from this, how does one determine whether to use the value from quadrant I or II?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
8K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K