Predicting Buckling Load for Thin-Walled Structures Using ANSYS/Nastran

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the critical buckling load for a short, wide cross-section column using Johnson's Formula. The user has calculated a critical buckling load (Pcr) of 57,119,986 N but seeks verification of their method, expressing concerns about the assumptions made for thin-walled structures. It is noted that typical buckling problems assume a deflected shape, which may not apply here due to the column's characteristics. The conversation highlights the lack of specific formulas for thin-rectangular tubes compared to thin-cylindrical tubes, suggesting that initial imperfections in manufacturing can significantly affect critical loads. A recommendation is made to utilize ANSYS/Nastran for a more accurate buckling model with an appropriate safety factor.
n707jt
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Finding the critical buckling load of a really short column with wide cross section (is it still considered a column?)

E = 22 GPa
Yield: 300 MPa
Load: 28N
thickness: 0.226 mm
I = 670706.51 mm^4 (is this right?)
Load Applied Area (as indicated by white arrows): 190400 mm²

Presentation1-2.jpg


I understand from http://www.engineersedge.com/column_buckling/column_ideal.htm that I should be applying Johnson's Formula.

Homework Equations



Euler Buckling :

[URL]http://172.31.254.243/www.engineersedge.com/column_buckling/image/column1.gif[/URL]

Johnson's Formula

[URL]http://172.31.254.244/www.engineersedge.com/column_buckling/image/johnson.gif[/URL]



The Attempt at a Solution



Using Johnson's formula, I've found out the Critical Buckling Load (Pcr) is 57119986 N

I know this is a really short structure with a wide cross sectional area so naturally the Pcr will be bigger but could someone please verify my method?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think that will work. Typical buckling problems assume a deflected shape, which you won't get.

The issue is not that it is short, but that it is thin-walled. Roark gives an idea for thin-cylindrical tubes, but not thin-rectangular tubes. I will quote his paragraph, 12.3 Columns and other Compressions Members
For a thin cylindrical tube, the theoretical formula for the critical stress at which buckling occurs is
<br /> \sigma&#039; = \frac{E}{\sqrt{3}\sqrt{1-\nu^2}}\frac{t}{R}<br />
when R denotes the mean radius of the tube. Tests indicate that the critical stress actually developed is usually only 40-60% of this theoretical value.

Much recent work has been concerned with measuring initial imperfections in manufactured cylindrical tubes and correlating these imperfections with measured critical loads.

My best guess would be to perhaps run a really good buckling model in ANSYS/Nastran and give it a good safety factor.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
49K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
503K