Preparing for Classical Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
To prepare for a classical mechanics class, it's essential to build a solid foundation in the subject, especially if previous mechanics courses were challenging. Engaging with introductory physics problems can help reinforce understanding of mechanical systems and problem-solving techniques. Recommended resources include K&K's "Introduction to Mechanics" for a comprehensive overview and Taylor's "Classical Mechanics" for its clear explanations and approachable style. Marion and Thornton's textbook is often criticized for its lack of clarity, leading many students to seek alternative texts. Practicing problems is crucial, and a good grasp of mathematics, particularly in areas like trigonometric substitutions and integrals, will be beneficial. Exploring various textbooks can provide different perspectives and explanations, aiding in a deeper understanding of classical mechanics concepts.
jesuslovesu
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
I'm an EE student and I am going to take modern physics next semester, and then would like to take classical mechanics. I was enrolled for about a half week in a classical mechanics class but it seemed really hardcore and I wasn't prepared for it. (The first homework problem was: Describe the motion of a perfectly flexible cable that falls off a table, what?)

My question is how to best prepare for this class? My previous classes in mechanics haven't been very good.

Should I read K&K's introduction to mechanics? Should I try to get through Classical Dynamics by Marion and Thornton by myself?

My preparation in mathematics should be good enough, I have taken Linear Algebra, Diff eq, Calc 3. Although I am a bit rusty on trig substitutions and performing the integrals.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Marion and Thornton is kind of crappy. I've never done K&K. If you can find Hand and Finch, that is my favorite.
 
If you're confident in math, you should practice as many problems as possible. If you're having trouble understanding the mechanical systems being described in the question, or hard time imagining what will happen to the system intuitively, or don't know how to start the problem by setting up coordinate system and reference frame and such, then I suggest get a good intro physics book and start solving problem there as many as possible.

In classical mechanics class, you will see many of the same problems that you encounter in intro courses but only with much rigor or different formulation of mechanics.

I agree with above comment: In my opinion, M&T doesn't explain much of what they do and why they do it.

If you're don't want to go back and solve intro physics problems but must start by reading upper level course textbook I strongly suggest Taylor's classical mechanics. His book is twice thicker than M&T but he's friendly approach reminds me of Griffith's EM. This book is almost like a spoon fed. It will explain almost every step it takes.
 
Last edited:
when i was taking classical mechanics, we were assigned M&T. Naturally, everyone hated that book and you would see practically everyone with some different book. I found an old copy of Arya's text in my school library and used that. Later in the course, once lagrangians are came into play, i used landau. Now whenever i need to look something up, i simply read taylor, so out of all these books, id say you can't lose with taylor.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Back
Top