Preparing to defend my dissertation

  • Context: Testing 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Adoniram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dissertation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around experiences and insights related to defending a dissertation, particularly focusing on the format and expectations of the defense process. Participants share their perspectives on the variations in procedures across different institutions and countries, as well as the nature of the questioning that occurs during the defense.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks insights into the private session following the defense, expressing curiosity about the types of questions asked and the overall conversation.
  • Another participant notes that defense procedures can vary significantly between countries and universities, suggesting that the original inquiry is too general for specific advice.
  • A third participant speculates on the original poster's background, indicating they may be in Texas and suggesting their dissertation topic might relate to IT or Cosmology.
  • A different participant shares their experience, outlining common elements of the defense process, including the structure of the presentation and the nature of questioning, while emphasizing the importance of preparation and understanding specific institutional rules.
  • This participant also advises practicing responses to questions and suggests that it is acceptable to acknowledge when one does not know an answer, provided they follow up with related knowledge or approaches to find the answer.
  • There is a note that the advice given is based on the North American PhD defense system, which may not apply universally.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that dissertation defense procedures can vary widely, and there is no consensus on a singular approach or experience. Multiple competing views and experiences are presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of specific details about the original poster's institution and the potential differences in defense formats that may not be addressed in the discussion.

Adoniram
Messages
93
Reaction score
6
Hi everyone, I'm going up for my defense in a few weeks and just wanted to get some insight from others as to what their experiences were like. I've been to many of my colleague's defense presentations, but there is always a ~60 min private session afterwards. Professors are very reluctant to share anything about what happened in the closed-door session, so I wanted to see what others have experienced.

Even if you believe your experience was a true snow-flake-unique moment, I'd still appreciate hearing what you were asked, what the conversation was like, etc. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Adoniram said:
Hi everyone, I'm going up for my defense in a few weeks and just wanted to get some insight from others as to what their experiences were like. I've been to many of my colleague's defense presentations, but there is always a ~60 min private session afterwards. Professors are very reluctant to share anything about what happened in the closed-door session, so I wanted to see what others have experienced.

Even if you believe your experience was a true snow-flake-unique moment, I'd still appreciate hearing what you were asked, what the conversation was like, etc. Thank you!
This is way too general to give you any advice. Thesis defence procedures vary greatly between countries and sometimes even between universities.
 
Well, based on his Profile page, he's in Texas in the US, and his dissertation is either about IT or Cosmology. But it doesn't look to be a PhD dissertation, if I'm reading his recent posts with Cosmology questions correctly...

Profile said:
Location:
Roanoke, TX
Occupation:
IT Analyst
Completed Educational Background:
Undergrad
Degree in:
Physics
Favorite Area of Science:
Astrophysics
 
I agree that the process can vary considerably from school to school, but I think there are some common elements.

I've been through the process as a student, supervisor, and examination committee member.

Often there are parts of the defence where you have to wait outside. In the beginning, the chair will go over the rules, sometimes they will talk about your, reviewing your history as a committee, etc. Then following the defence there's a closed deliberation where the committee arrives at a consensus.

Usually there's a presentation. Whether this is open to the public or not is a school-specific thing. From a candidate's POV, this is something you want to put a lot of effort into because it's the part of the defence you have the most control over. You want to make sure that you cover the work that you've done, and that it's clear what you did as opposed to what was accomplished by the collaboration as a whole. Keep your audience in mind too. Your examination committee will have read the thesis prior to the defence and will be familiar with your work. (If it's a fully public presentation, you might have to spend more time introducing the basics.)

Following the presentation there are several rounds of questioning. In my experience the first round tends to derive directly from the presentation (just like you're giving a conference talk). Then the next round will delve into the details of the thesis. Make sure you know specifically what the rules are and prepare for the specific format. In some cases, the chair of the examining committee is supposed to keep the committee focused specifically on the thesis details. In other cases "background knowledge" questions are allowed.

Practice answering questions orally. Get your friends to fire questions at you and stand in front of them and answer. The more practice you have the better. Practice using the whiteboard (or whatever tools you have available). Practice breaking down the questions.

It's okay to say that you don't know the answer to something. It's better to follow that with "here's what I do know" or "here's how I would figure that out."

Practice listening to the specifics of questions. Sometimes candidates will hone in on specific words or phrases and answer what they believe the examiner is asking, but miss the details. Restate the question in your own words. Take the time to clarify.

EDIT: I was assuming PhD defence in the North American system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
3K