Prerequisites for John Taylor classical mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The prerequisites for John Taylor's classical mechanics textbook include first-year mechanics and some differential equations, which can be learned concurrently. A user, currently studying differential equations, seeks advice on whether to start the book now or wait until completing the course. Responses suggest that the user has sufficient background to begin, with the understanding that some challenging topics may arise later in the book. Recommendations for additional classical mechanics texts, such as Goldstein and Marion, highlight Taylor as a suitable starting point. The consensus encourages diving into Taylor's book while using supplementary resources for any difficult concepts encountered.
bigmike94
Messages
99
Reaction score
61
Inside the textbook, the prerequisites state first year mechanics and some differential equations, although it continues to say the differential equations can be learned as you’re working your way through the book, as differential equations were basically “invented” to be used for applied situations and not abstractly. (I think?)

I am around 1/3 to a 1/2 through my differential equations course, so I do have the required “some differential equations”

But to gain the full benefits from the book would you recommend waiting till the end of the course or just diving straight in. I have completed first year mechanics and nearly all of Calculus 3.

Thank you.

Side note; although I am on a part time degree I mostly study for fun and plan on reading David morins mechanic book and a few others after John Taylor’s, so I am not too worried about not being able to pick up everything straight away, but also don’t want to be left scratching my head. If a full course in differential equations is required then I’ll happy wait. I’m in no rush.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would go for it. I think you have enough background to get through it.

I think you might run into boundary value problems and/or partial differential equations later in the book if they cover waves in Chapter 16 (last chapter) and possibly Calculus of Variations in Chapter 6.

Based on the table of contents for the book:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/189138922X/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
jedishrfu said:
I would go for it. I think you have enough background to get through it.

I think you might run into boundary value problems and/or partial differential equations later in the book if they cover waves in Chapter 16 (last chapter) and possibly Calculus of Variations in Chapter 6.

Based on the table of contents for the book:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/189138922X/?tag=pfamazon01-20
Thank you for the reply, I think I’ll go for it then, hopefully by the time I get to the more challenging concepts I will have completed the differential equations course. If not, like I said whatever I don’t fully understand hopefully David Morins book can help.
 
Just go for it. If you encounter a differential equation you are not familiar with, look it up.
 
malawi_glenn said:
Just go for it. If you encounter a differential equation you are not familiar with, look it up.
Just ordered it 💪 cheers 👍
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and berkeman
There are other good Classical Mechanics books besides Taylor namely Goldstein's, Marion's, Landau...

Goldstein was the gold standard for Classical Mechanics. Marion was the book I used but wish I had Goldstein. Landau is a very brief book but it stopped me in the first few pages.

I think Taylor is a good first choice though and later you can branch out into the others based on your interest and passion.

Here's an earlier thread comparing the classics:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/which-classical-mechanics-book-has-better-content.915485/
 
  • Like
Likes bigmike94 and malawi_glenn
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top