Presentations on experiments / lab work

  • Context: Testing 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiments Lab Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around preparing a slideshow presentation for lab work, focusing on structure, content, and delivery. Participants share insights on effective presentation styles, audience engagement, and how to handle varying quality of experimental data.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that effective presentations tell a story and emphasize the importance of motivating the audience.
  • One participant shares an example of a presentation they found effective, highlighting its informative nature and clear narrative.
  • There is a discussion about the placement of experiments with varying data quality, with suggestions to use a "sh*t sandwich" approach or to frame the mediocre data differently based on the narrative.
  • Concerns are raised about managing time during presentations, with advice to practice and consider audience expectations.
  • Participants discuss the nature of "mediocre" results, questioning whether they stem from incorrect outcomes or unmet expectations, and how to communicate this in a presentation.
  • One participant reflects on their own presentation experience, noting the positive reception of a conversational style and the value of addressing inaccuracies openly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on presentation strategies, with no clear consensus on the optimal structure or handling of data quality. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approaches to storytelling in presentations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for clarity in assumptions and methodologies, as well as the importance of tailoring presentations to different audiences, but do not resolve these aspects.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals preparing presentations on experimental work, educators seeking to improve their presentation skills, and students looking for insights on effective communication in scientific contexts.

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
I'm trying to prepare a slideshow presentation of some lab-work we've undertaken. It's to be around 15 minutes in length and comprise of a few different (but related) experiments.

I would like to ask if anybody knows of one or a few "exemplary" experimental physics presentations (on YouTube, etc.) of similar length so that I can get a sense of what style to aim for. What is an optimal structure of such a presentation? I'm interested to see what weighting is given to motivation/background, experimental considerations, results, error analysis, comments... any advice r.e. structure would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The best talks tell a story. It is rare that your audience does not need need to be motivated on why they should care and explained to on what they need to take away. Don’t overfill the talk.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE and ergospherical
Here's an example I found myself:



I think this is a really good presentation. It's informative but not overwhelming, and he explains all the key experimental considerations instead of just chugging through analysis. (There's a clear "story"!)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Hamiltonian
Another point; we have two experiments with very good data and one with mediocre data. I think it was my dad who introduced me to the concept of a "sh*t sandwich*... I'm assuming the best strategy is to put the mediocre experiment in the middle of the talk?
 
ergospherical said:
Another point; we have two experiments with very good data and one with mediocre data. I think it was my dad who introduced me to the concept of a "sh*t sandwich*... I'm assuming the best strategy is to put the mediocre experiment in the middle of the talk?
It depends on the story you want to tell. You could also place first with “we now can do better.” You could also place it last with ”there are things we still need to understand”
 
I just ran through some project where the results were not what I was expecting. Is it mediocre because it's wrong or is it mediocre because it wasn't what you were expecting? I think either way you can continue to tell the story as suggested above. Here's what we did and here's why it's wrong, and what we should have done... lalalala... next steps or what we recommend for the next person. We thought that doing X would get Y, but these are the lessons learned and why it did something different.

Something a lot of presenters mess up on (including myself) is keeping track of the time. I have a 7 minute presentation coming up on Thursday myself and those 7 minutes are way too short for what I would have liked to share. I would definitely be considerate of how much time you'll have on each slide if it has slides and you might even have less due to questions. Practice! Practice even if it's with nobody, and if you can practice with a few people or even a few 1:1 run it by some people, then you have the chance to see how long it takes, what kind of questions they might ask, or maybe they'll point out things they liked or didn't like (this graph didn't make sense, I don't understand why this is important, the arrows look silly).

Cater to your audience and make sure you understand what they want. My presentation for class it's not fun showing all the details up front and I love unraveling the mystery. At work: I better have a table with the results on the first slide or two. My managers can interpret graphs and I have it ready to go in case they ask, but they want the bottom line as soon as possible (doe this meet our criteria?). Here's what I have, here's how it improved or worsened, and then I walk them through the story... Here's what I tried, these are the knobs I turned, and here's what I saw. These results make sense because or don't make sense because of xyz fundamental.

Best of luck and have fun :)
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: ergospherical
Joshy said:
Is it mediocre because it's wrong or is it mediocre because it wasn't what you were expecting?
The results themselves are still fairly accurate, but some of the assumptions are questionable and there are some aspects of the methodology I'd change in hindsight. Not the end of the world by any means, though.
 
Today’s the big day. :oldbiggrin:
Write my slides in ##\LaTeX##, feeling good.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Hamiltonian
Good luck.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: ergospherical
  • #10
That was quite fun, actually! As soon as I started talking I sort of forgot about nerves and stuff - one of the professors marking it commented that the style was very conversational but that he actually quite liked it as opposed to reading from a script. I also made sure to comment a fair bit on the stuff that wasn't quite right, which the panel seemed to appreciate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, Jody, vanhees71 and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
81
Views
11K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K